Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using array strategy.
You are given an integer array nums of length n and a 2D array queries where queries[i] = [li, ri, vali].
Each queries[i] represents the following action on nums:
[li, ri] in nums by at most vali.A Zero Array is an array with all its elements equal to 0.
Return the minimum possible non-negative value of k, such that after processing the first k queries in sequence, nums becomes a Zero Array. If no such k exists, return -1.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [2,0,2], queries = [[0,2,1],[0,2,1],[1,1,3]]
Output: 2
Explanation:
[0, 1, 2] by [1, 0, 1] respectively.[1, 0, 1].[0, 1, 2] by [1, 0, 1] respectively.[0, 0, 0], which is a Zero Array. Therefore, the minimum value of k is 2.Example 2:
Input: nums = [4,3,2,1], queries = [[1,3,2],[0,2,1]]
Output: -1
Explanation:
[1, 2, 3] by [2, 2, 1] respectively.[4, 1, 0, 0].[0, 1, 2] by [1, 1, 0] respectively.[3, 0, 0, 0], which is not a Zero Array.Constraints:
1 <= nums.length <= 1050 <= nums[i] <= 5 * 1051 <= queries.length <= 105queries[i].length == 30 <= li <= ri < nums.length1 <= vali <= 5Problem summary: You are given an integer array nums of length n and a 2D array queries where queries[i] = [li, ri, vali]. Each queries[i] represents the following action on nums: Decrement the value at each index in the range [li, ri] in nums by at most vali. The amount by which each value is decremented can be chosen independently for each index. A Zero Array is an array with all its elements equal to 0. Return the minimum possible non-negative value of k, such that after processing the first k queries in sequence, nums becomes a Zero Array. If no such k exists, return -1.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Binary Search
[2,0,2] [[0,2,1],[0,2,1],[1,1,3]]
[4,3,2,1] [[1,3,2],[0,2,1]]
corporate-flight-bookings)minimum-moves-to-make-array-complementary)zero-array-transformation-iv)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3356: Zero Array Transformation II
class Solution {
private int n;
private int[] nums;
private int[][] queries;
public int minZeroArray(int[] nums, int[][] queries) {
this.nums = nums;
this.queries = queries;
n = nums.length;
int m = queries.length;
int l = 0, r = m + 1;
while (l < r) {
int mid = (l + r) >> 1;
if (check(mid)) {
r = mid;
} else {
l = mid + 1;
}
}
return l > m ? -1 : l;
}
private boolean check(int k) {
int[] d = new int[n + 1];
for (int i = 0; i < k; ++i) {
int l = queries[i][0], r = queries[i][1], val = queries[i][2];
d[l] += val;
d[r + 1] -= val;
}
for (int i = 0, s = 0; i < n; ++i) {
s += d[i];
if (nums[i] > s) {
return false;
}
}
return true;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3356: Zero Array Transformation II
func minZeroArray(nums []int, queries [][]int) int {
n, m := len(nums), len(queries)
l := sort.Search(m+1, func(k int) bool {
d := make([]int, n+1)
for _, q := range queries[:k] {
l, r, val := q[0], q[1], q[2]
d[l] += val
d[r+1] -= val
}
s := 0
for i, x := range nums {
s += d[i]
if x > s {
return false
}
}
return true
})
if l > m {
return -1
}
return l
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #3356: Zero Array Transformation II
class Solution:
def minZeroArray(self, nums: List[int], queries: List[List[int]]) -> int:
def check(k: int) -> bool:
d = [0] * (len(nums) + 1)
for l, r, val in queries[:k]:
d[l] += val
d[r + 1] -= val
s = 0
for x, y in zip(nums, d):
s += y
if x > s:
return False
return True
m = len(queries)
l = bisect_left(range(m + 1), True, key=check)
return -1 if l > m else l
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3356: Zero Array Transformation II
impl Solution {
pub fn min_zero_array(nums: Vec<i32>, queries: Vec<Vec<i32>>) -> i32 {
let n = nums.len();
let m = queries.len();
let mut d: Vec<i64> = vec![0; n + 1];
let (mut l, mut r) = (0_usize, m + 1);
let check = |k: usize, d: &mut Vec<i64>| -> bool {
d.fill(0);
for i in 0..k {
let (l, r, val) = (
queries[i][0] as usize,
queries[i][1] as usize,
queries[i][2] as i64,
);
d[l] += val;
d[r + 1] -= val;
}
let mut s: i64 = 0;
for i in 0..n {
s += d[i];
if nums[i] as i64 > s {
return false;
}
}
true
};
while l < r {
let mid = (l + r) >> 1;
if check(mid, &mut d) {
r = mid;
} else {
l = mid + 1;
}
}
if l > m {
-1
} else {
l as i32
}
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3356: Zero Array Transformation II
function minZeroArray(nums: number[], queries: number[][]): number {
const [n, m] = [nums.length, queries.length];
const d: number[] = Array(n + 1);
let [l, r] = [0, m + 1];
const check = (k: number): boolean => {
d.fill(0);
for (let i = 0; i < k; ++i) {
const [l, r, val] = queries[i];
d[l] += val;
d[r + 1] -= val;
}
for (let i = 0, s = 0; i < n; ++i) {
s += d[i];
if (nums[i] > s) {
return false;
}
}
return true;
};
while (l < r) {
const mid = (l + r) >> 1;
if (check(mid)) {
r = mid;
} else {
l = mid + 1;
}
}
return l > m ? -1 : l;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Check every element from left to right until we find the target or exhaust the array. Each comparison is O(1), and we may visit all n elements, giving O(n). No extra space needed.
Each comparison eliminates half the remaining search space. After k comparisons, the space is n/2ᵏ. We stop when the space is 1, so k = log₂ n. No extra memory needed — just two pointers (lo, hi).
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Setting `lo = mid` or `hi = mid` can stall and create an infinite loop.
Usually fails on: Two-element ranges never converge.
Fix: Use `lo = mid + 1` or `hi = mid - 1` where appropriate.