Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using array strategy.
You are given an integer array nums. This array contains n elements, where exactly n - 2 elements are special numbers. One of the remaining two elements is the sum of these special numbers, and the other is an outlier.
An outlier is defined as a number that is neither one of the original special numbers nor the element representing the sum of those numbers.
Note that special numbers, the sum element, and the outlier must have distinct indices, but may share the same value.
Return the largest potential outlier in nums.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [2,3,5,10]
Output: 10
Explanation:
The special numbers could be 2 and 3, thus making their sum 5 and the outlier 10.
Example 2:
Input: nums = [-2,-1,-3,-6,4]
Output: 4
Explanation:
The special numbers could be -2, -1, and -3, thus making their sum -6 and the outlier 4.
Example 3:
Input: nums = [1,1,1,1,1,5,5]
Output: 5
Explanation:
The special numbers could be 1, 1, 1, 1, and 1, thus making their sum 5 and the other 5 as the outlier.
Constraints:
3 <= nums.length <= 105-1000 <= nums[i] <= 1000nums.Problem summary: You are given an integer array nums. This array contains n elements, where exactly n - 2 elements are special numbers. One of the remaining two elements is the sum of these special numbers, and the other is an outlier. An outlier is defined as a number that is neither one of the original special numbers nor the element representing the sum of those numbers. Note that special numbers, the sum element, and the outlier must have distinct indices, but may share the same value. Return the largest potential outlier in nums.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Hash Map
[2,3,5,10]
[-2,-1,-3,-6,4]
[1,1,1,1,1,5,5]
Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3371: Identify the Largest Outlier in an Array
class Solution {
public int getLargestOutlier(int[] nums) {
int s = 0;
Map<Integer, Integer> cnt = new HashMap<>();
for (int x : nums) {
s += x;
cnt.merge(x, 1, Integer::sum);
}
int ans = Integer.MIN_VALUE;
for (var e : cnt.entrySet()) {
int x = e.getKey(), v = e.getValue();
int t = s - x;
if (t % 2 != 0 || !cnt.containsKey(t / 2)) {
continue;
}
if (x != t / 2 || v > 1) {
ans = Math.max(ans, x);
}
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3371: Identify the Largest Outlier in an Array
func getLargestOutlier(nums []int) int {
s := 0
cnt := map[int]int{}
for _, x := range nums {
s += x
cnt[x]++
}
ans := math.MinInt32
for x, v := range cnt {
t := s - x
if t%2 != 0 || cnt[t/2] == 0 {
continue
}
if x != t/2 || v > 1 {
ans = max(ans, x)
}
}
return ans
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #3371: Identify the Largest Outlier in an Array
class Solution:
def getLargestOutlier(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
s = sum(nums)
cnt = Counter(nums)
ans = -inf
for x, v in cnt.items():
t = s - x
if t % 2 or cnt[t // 2] == 0:
continue
if x != t // 2 or v > 1:
ans = max(ans, x)
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3371: Identify the Largest Outlier in an Array
use std::collections::HashMap;
impl Solution {
pub fn get_largest_outlier(nums: Vec<i32>) -> i32 {
let mut s = 0;
let mut cnt = HashMap::new();
for &x in &nums {
s += x;
*cnt.entry(x).or_insert(0) += 1;
}
let mut ans = i32::MIN;
for (&x, &v) in &cnt {
let t = s - x;
if t % 2 != 0 {
continue;
}
let y = t / 2;
if let Some(&count_y) = cnt.get(&y) {
if x != y || v > 1 {
ans = ans.max(x);
}
}
}
ans
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3371: Identify the Largest Outlier in an Array
function getLargestOutlier(nums: number[]): number {
let s = 0;
const cnt: Record<number, number> = {};
for (const x of nums) {
s += x;
cnt[x] = (cnt[x] || 0) + 1;
}
let ans = -Infinity;
for (const [x, v] of Object.entries(cnt)) {
const t = s - +x;
if (t % 2 || !cnt.hasOwnProperty((t / 2) | 0)) {
continue;
}
if (+x != ((t / 2) | 0) || v > 1) {
ans = Math.max(ans, +x);
}
}
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Zero-count keys stay in map and break distinct/count constraints.
Usually fails on: Window/map size checks are consistently off by one.
Fix: Delete keys when count reaches zero.