Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on array fundamentals.
You are given a m x n matrix grid consisting of non-negative integers.
In one operation, you can increment the value of any grid[i][j] by 1.
Return the minimum number of operations needed to make all columns of grid strictly increasing.
Example 1:
Input: grid = [[3,2],[1,3],[3,4],[0,1]]
Output: 15
Explanation:
0th column strictly increasing, we can apply 3 operations on grid[1][0], 2 operations on grid[2][0], and 6 operations on grid[3][0].1st column strictly increasing, we can apply 4 operations on grid[3][1].Example 2:
Input: grid = [[3,2,1],[2,1,0],[1,2,3]]
Output: 12
Explanation:
0th column strictly increasing, we can apply 2 operations on grid[1][0], and 4 operations on grid[2][0].1st column strictly increasing, we can apply 2 operations on grid[1][1], and 2 operations on grid[2][1].2nd column strictly increasing, we can apply 2 operations on grid[1][2].Constraints:
m == grid.lengthn == grid[i].length1 <= m, n <= 500 <= grid[i][j] < 2500Problem summary: You are given a m x n matrix grid consisting of non-negative integers. In one operation, you can increment the value of any grid[i][j] by 1. Return the minimum number of operations needed to make all columns of grid strictly increasing.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Greedy
[[3,2],[1,3],[3,4],[0,1]]
[[3,2,1],[2,1,0],[1,2,3]]
minimum-operations-to-make-the-array-increasing)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3402: Minimum Operations to Make Columns Strictly Increasing
class Solution {
public int minimumOperations(int[][] grid) {
int m = grid.length, n = grid[0].length;
int ans = 0;
for (int j = 0; j < n; ++j) {
int pre = -1;
for (int i = 0; i < m; ++i) {
int cur = grid[i][j];
if (pre < cur) {
pre = cur;
} else {
++pre;
ans += pre - cur;
}
}
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3402: Minimum Operations to Make Columns Strictly Increasing
func minimumOperations(grid [][]int) (ans int) {
m, n := len(grid), len(grid[0])
for j := 0; j < n; j++ {
pre := -1
for i := 0; i < m; i++ {
cur := grid[i][j]
if pre < cur {
pre = cur
} else {
pre++
ans += pre - cur
}
}
}
return
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #3402: Minimum Operations to Make Columns Strictly Increasing
class Solution:
def minimumOperations(self, grid: List[List[int]]) -> int:
ans = 0
for col in zip(*grid):
pre = -1
for cur in col:
if pre < cur:
pre = cur
else:
pre += 1
ans += pre - cur
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3402: Minimum Operations to Make Columns Strictly Increasing
fn minimum_operations(grid: Vec<Vec<i32>>) -> i32 {
let mut ret = 0;
let (rows, cols) = (grid.len(), grid[0].len());
for j in 0..cols {
let mut prev = grid[0][j];
for i in 1..rows {
if prev >= grid[i][j] {
ret += prev - grid[i][j] + 1;
prev += 1;
} else {
prev = grid[i][j];
}
}
}
ret
}
fn main() {
let grid = vec![vec![3, 2], vec![1, 3], vec![3, 4], vec![0, 1]];
let ret = minimum_operations(grid);
println!("ret={ret}");
}
#[test]
fn test() {
{
let grid = vec![vec![3, 2], vec![1, 3], vec![3, 4], vec![0, 1]];
let ret = minimum_operations(grid);
assert_eq!(ret, 15);
}
{
let grid = vec![vec![3, 2, 1], vec![2, 1, 0], vec![1, 2, 3]];
let ret = minimum_operations(grid);
assert_eq!(ret, 12);
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3402: Minimum Operations to Make Columns Strictly Increasing
function minimumOperations(grid: number[][]): number {
const [m, n] = [grid.length, grid[0].length];
let ans: number = 0;
for (let j = 0; j < n; ++j) {
let pre: number = -1;
for (let i = 0; i < m; ++i) {
const cur = grid[i][j];
if (pre < cur) {
pre = cur;
} else {
++pre;
ans += pre - cur;
}
}
}
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Try every possible combination of choices. With n items each having two states (include/exclude), the search space is 2ⁿ. Evaluating each combination takes O(n), giving O(n × 2ⁿ). The recursion stack or subset storage uses O(n) space.
Greedy algorithms typically sort the input (O(n log n)) then make a single pass (O(n)). The sort dominates. If the input is already sorted or the greedy choice can be computed without sorting, time drops to O(n). Proving greedy correctness (exchange argument) is harder than the implementation.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Locally optimal choices may fail globally.
Usually fails on: Counterexamples appear on crafted input orderings.
Fix: Verify with exchange argument or monotonic objective before committing.