Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using array strategy.
You are given an integer eventTime denoting the duration of an event. You are also given two integer arrays startTime and endTime, each of length n.
These represent the start and end times of n non-overlapping meetings that occur during the event between time t = 0 and time t = eventTime, where the ith meeting occurs during the time [startTime[i], endTime[i]].
You can reschedule at most one meeting by moving its start time while maintaining the same duration, such that the meetings remain non-overlapping, to maximize the longest continuous period of free time during the event.
Return the maximum amount of free time possible after rearranging the meetings.
Note that the meetings can not be rescheduled to a time outside the event and they should remain non-overlapping.
Note: In this version, it is valid for the relative ordering of the meetings to change after rescheduling one meeting.
Example 1:
Input: eventTime = 5, startTime = [1,3], endTime = [2,5]
Output: 2
Explanation:
Reschedule the meeting at [1, 2] to [2, 3], leaving no meetings during the time [0, 2].
Example 2:
Input: eventTime = 10, startTime = [0,7,9], endTime = [1,8,10]
Output: 7
Explanation:
Reschedule the meeting at [0, 1] to [8, 9], leaving no meetings during the time [0, 7].
Example 3:
Input: eventTime = 10, startTime = [0,3,7,9], endTime = [1,4,8,10]
Output: 6
Explanation:
Reschedule the meeting at [3, 4] to [8, 9], leaving no meetings during the time [1, 7].
Example 4:
Input: eventTime = 5, startTime = [0,1,2,3,4], endTime = [1,2,3,4,5]
Output: 0
Explanation:
There is no time during the event not occupied by meetings.
Constraints:
1 <= eventTime <= 109n == startTime.length == endTime.length2 <= n <= 1050 <= startTime[i] < endTime[i] <= eventTimeendTime[i] <= startTime[i + 1] where i lies in the range [0, n - 2].Problem summary: You are given an integer eventTime denoting the duration of an event. You are also given two integer arrays startTime and endTime, each of length n. These represent the start and end times of n non-overlapping meetings that occur during the event between time t = 0 and time t = eventTime, where the ith meeting occurs during the time [startTime[i], endTime[i]]. You can reschedule at most one meeting by moving its start time while maintaining the same duration, such that the meetings remain non-overlapping, to maximize the longest continuous period of free time during the event. Return the maximum amount of free time possible after rearranging the meetings. Note that the meetings can not be rescheduled to a time outside the event and they should remain non-overlapping. Note: In this version, it is valid for the relative ordering of the meetings to change after rescheduling one meeting.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Greedy
5 [1,3] [2,5]
10 [0,7,9] [1,8,10]
10 [0,3,7,9] [1,4,8,10]
Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3440: Reschedule Meetings for Maximum Free Time II
class Solution {
public int maxFreeTime(int eventTime, int[] startTime, int[] endTime) {
int n = startTime.length;
int[] pre = new int[n];
int[] suf = new int[n];
pre[0] = startTime[0];
suf[n - 1] = eventTime - endTime[n - 1];
for (int i = 1; i < n; i++) {
pre[i] = Math.max(pre[i - 1], startTime[i] - endTime[i - 1]);
}
for (int i = n - 2; i >= 0; i--) {
suf[i] = Math.max(suf[i + 1], startTime[i + 1] - endTime[i]);
}
int ans = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
int l = (i == 0) ? 0 : endTime[i - 1];
int r = (i == n - 1) ? eventTime : startTime[i + 1];
int w = endTime[i] - startTime[i];
ans = Math.max(ans, r - l - w);
if (i > 0 && pre[i - 1] >= w) {
ans = Math.max(ans, r - l);
} else if (i + 1 < n && suf[i + 1] >= w) {
ans = Math.max(ans, r - l);
}
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3440: Reschedule Meetings for Maximum Free Time II
func maxFreeTime(eventTime int, startTime []int, endTime []int) int {
n := len(startTime)
pre := make([]int, n)
suf := make([]int, n)
pre[0] = startTime[0]
suf[n-1] = eventTime - endTime[n-1]
for i := 1; i < n; i++ {
pre[i] = max(pre[i-1], startTime[i]-endTime[i-1])
}
for i := n - 2; i >= 0; i-- {
suf[i] = max(suf[i+1], startTime[i+1]-endTime[i])
}
ans := 0
for i := 0; i < n; i++ {
l := 0
if i > 0 {
l = endTime[i-1]
}
r := eventTime
if i < n-1 {
r = startTime[i+1]
}
w := endTime[i] - startTime[i]
ans = max(ans, r-l-w)
if i > 0 && pre[i-1] >= w {
ans = max(ans, r-l)
} else if i+1 < n && suf[i+1] >= w {
ans = max(ans, r-l)
}
}
return ans
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #3440: Reschedule Meetings for Maximum Free Time II
class Solution:
def maxFreeTime(
self, eventTime: int, startTime: List[int], endTime: List[int]
) -> int:
n = len(startTime)
pre = [0] * n
suf = [0] * n
pre[0] = startTime[0]
suf[n - 1] = eventTime - endTime[-1]
for i in range(1, n):
pre[i] = max(pre[i - 1], startTime[i] - endTime[i - 1])
for i in range(n - 2, -1, -1):
suf[i] = max(suf[i + 1], startTime[i + 1] - endTime[i])
ans = 0
for i in range(n):
l = 0 if i == 0 else endTime[i - 1]
r = eventTime if i == n - 1 else startTime[i + 1]
w = endTime[i] - startTime[i]
ans = max(ans, r - l - w)
if i and pre[i - 1] >= w:
ans = max(ans, r - l)
elif i + 1 < n and suf[i + 1] >= w:
ans = max(ans, r - l)
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3440: Reschedule Meetings for Maximum Free Time II
impl Solution {
pub fn max_free_time(event_time: i32, start_time: Vec<i32>, end_time: Vec<i32>) -> i32 {
let n = start_time.len();
let mut pre = vec![0; n];
let mut suf = vec![0; n];
pre[0] = start_time[0];
suf[n - 1] = event_time - end_time[n - 1];
for i in 1..n {
pre[i] = pre[i - 1].max(start_time[i] - end_time[i - 1]);
}
for i in (0..n - 1).rev() {
suf[i] = suf[i + 1].max(start_time[i + 1] - end_time[i]);
}
let mut ans = 0;
for i in 0..n {
let l = if i == 0 { 0 } else { end_time[i - 1] };
let r = if i == n - 1 {
event_time
} else {
start_time[i + 1]
};
let w = end_time[i] - start_time[i];
ans = ans.max(r - l - w);
if i > 0 && pre[i - 1] >= w {
ans = ans.max(r - l);
} else if i + 1 < n && suf[i + 1] >= w {
ans = ans.max(r - l);
}
}
ans
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3440: Reschedule Meetings for Maximum Free Time II
function maxFreeTime(eventTime: number, startTime: number[], endTime: number[]): number {
const n = startTime.length;
const pre: number[] = Array(n).fill(0);
const suf: number[] = Array(n).fill(0);
pre[0] = startTime[0];
suf[n - 1] = eventTime - endTime[n - 1];
for (let i = 1; i < n; i++) {
pre[i] = Math.max(pre[i - 1], startTime[i] - endTime[i - 1]);
}
for (let i = n - 2; i >= 0; i--) {
suf[i] = Math.max(suf[i + 1], startTime[i + 1] - endTime[i]);
}
let ans = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < n; i++) {
const l = i === 0 ? 0 : endTime[i - 1];
const r = i === n - 1 ? eventTime : startTime[i + 1];
const w = endTime[i] - startTime[i];
ans = Math.max(ans, r - l - w);
if (i > 0 && pre[i - 1] >= w) {
ans = Math.max(ans, r - l);
} else if (i + 1 < n && suf[i + 1] >= w) {
ans = Math.max(ans, r - l);
}
}
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Try every possible combination of choices. With n items each having two states (include/exclude), the search space is 2ⁿ. Evaluating each combination takes O(n), giving O(n × 2ⁿ). The recursion stack or subset storage uses O(n) space.
Greedy algorithms typically sort the input (O(n log n)) then make a single pass (O(n)). The sort dominates. If the input is already sorted or the greedy choice can be computed without sorting, time drops to O(n). Proving greedy correctness (exchange argument) is harder than the implementation.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Locally optimal choices may fail globally.
Usually fails on: Counterexamples appear on crafted input orderings.
Fix: Verify with exchange argument or monotonic objective before committing.