Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using array strategy.
You are given an integer n representing the number of nodes in a graph, labeled from 0 to n - 1.
You are also given an integer array nums of length n sorted in non-decreasing order, and an integer maxDiff.
An undirected edge exists between nodes i and j if the absolute difference between nums[i] and nums[j] is at most maxDiff (i.e., |nums[i] - nums[j]| <= maxDiff).
You are also given a 2D integer array queries. For each queries[i] = [ui, vi], determine whether there exists a path between nodes ui and vi.
Return a boolean array answer, where answer[i] is true if there exists a path between ui and vi in the ith query and false otherwise.
Example 1:
Input: n = 2, nums = [1,3], maxDiff = 1, queries = [[0,0],[0,1]]
Output: [true,false]
Explanation:
[0,0]: Node 0 has a trivial path to itself.[0,1]: There is no edge between Node 0 and Node 1 because |nums[0] - nums[1]| = |1 - 3| = 2, which is greater than maxDiff.[true, false].Example 2:
Input: n = 4, nums = [2,5,6,8], maxDiff = 2, queries = [[0,1],[0,2],[1,3],[2,3]]
Output: [false,false,true,true]
Explanation:
The resulting graph is:
[0,1]: There is no edge between Node 0 and Node 1 because |nums[0] - nums[1]| = |2 - 5| = 3, which is greater than maxDiff.[0,2]: There is no edge between Node 0 and Node 2 because |nums[0] - nums[2]| = |2 - 6| = 4, which is greater than maxDiff.[1,3]: There is a path between Node 1 and Node 3 through Node 2 since |nums[1] - nums[2]| = |5 - 6| = 1 and |nums[2] - nums[3]| = |6 - 8| = 2, both of which are within maxDiff.[2,3]: There is an edge between Node 2 and Node 3 because |nums[2] - nums[3]| = |6 - 8| = 2, which is equal to maxDiff.[false, false, true, true].Constraints:
1 <= n == nums.length <= 1050 <= nums[i] <= 105nums is sorted in non-decreasing order.0 <= maxDiff <= 1051 <= queries.length <= 105queries[i] == [ui, vi]0 <= ui, vi < nProblem summary: You are given an integer n representing the number of nodes in a graph, labeled from 0 to n - 1. You are also given an integer array nums of length n sorted in non-decreasing order, and an integer maxDiff. An undirected edge exists between nodes i and j if the absolute difference between nums[i] and nums[j] is at most maxDiff (i.e., |nums[i] - nums[j]| <= maxDiff). You are also given a 2D integer array queries. For each queries[i] = [ui, vi], determine whether there exists a path between nodes ui and vi. Return a boolean array answer, where answer[i] is true if there exists a path between ui and vi in the ith query and false otherwise.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Hash Map · Binary Search · Union-Find
2 [1,3] 1 [[0,0],[0,1]]
4 [2,5,6,8] 2 [[0,1],[0,2],[1,3],[2,3]]
Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3532: Path Existence Queries in a Graph I
class Solution {
public boolean[] pathExistenceQueries(int n, int[] nums, int maxDiff, int[][] queries) {
int[] g = new int[n];
int cnt = 0;
for (int i = 1; i < n; ++i) {
if (nums[i] - nums[i - 1] > maxDiff) {
cnt++;
}
g[i] = cnt;
}
int m = queries.length;
boolean[] ans = new boolean[m];
for (int i = 0; i < m; ++i) {
int u = queries[i][0];
int v = queries[i][1];
ans[i] = g[u] == g[v];
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3532: Path Existence Queries in a Graph I
func pathExistenceQueries(n int, nums []int, maxDiff int, queries [][]int) (ans []bool) {
g := make([]int, n)
cnt := 0
for i := 1; i < n; i++ {
if nums[i]-nums[i-1] > maxDiff {
cnt++
}
g[i] = cnt
}
for _, q := range queries {
u, v := q[0], q[1]
ans = append(ans, g[u] == g[v])
}
return
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #3532: Path Existence Queries in a Graph I
class Solution:
def pathExistenceQueries(
self, n: int, nums: List[int], maxDiff: int, queries: List[List[int]]
) -> List[bool]:
g = [0] * n
cnt = 0
for i in range(1, n):
if nums[i] - nums[i - 1] > maxDiff:
cnt += 1
g[i] = cnt
return [g[u] == g[v] for u, v in queries]
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3532: Path Existence Queries in a Graph I
// Rust example auto-generated from java reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #3532: Path Existence Queries in a Graph I
// class Solution {
// public boolean[] pathExistenceQueries(int n, int[] nums, int maxDiff, int[][] queries) {
// int[] g = new int[n];
// int cnt = 0;
// for (int i = 1; i < n; ++i) {
// if (nums[i] - nums[i - 1] > maxDiff) {
// cnt++;
// }
// g[i] = cnt;
// }
//
// int m = queries.length;
// boolean[] ans = new boolean[m];
// for (int i = 0; i < m; ++i) {
// int u = queries[i][0];
// int v = queries[i][1];
// ans[i] = g[u] == g[v];
// }
// return ans;
// }
// }
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3532: Path Existence Queries in a Graph I
function pathExistenceQueries(
n: number,
nums: number[],
maxDiff: number,
queries: number[][],
): boolean[] {
const g: number[] = Array(n).fill(0);
let cnt = 0;
for (let i = 1; i < n; ++i) {
if (nums[i] - nums[i - 1] > maxDiff) {
++cnt;
}
g[i] = cnt;
}
return queries.map(([u, v]) => g[u] === g[v]);
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Check every element from left to right until we find the target or exhaust the array. Each comparison is O(1), and we may visit all n elements, giving O(n). No extra space needed.
Each comparison eliminates half the remaining search space. After k comparisons, the space is n/2ᵏ. We stop when the space is 1, so k = log₂ n. No extra memory needed — just two pointers (lo, hi).
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Zero-count keys stay in map and break distinct/count constraints.
Usually fails on: Window/map size checks are consistently off by one.
Fix: Delete keys when count reaches zero.
Wrong move: Setting `lo = mid` or `hi = mid` can stall and create an infinite loop.
Usually fails on: Two-element ranges never converge.
Fix: Use `lo = mid + 1` or `hi = mid - 1` where appropriate.