Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using array strategy.
You are given an array complexity of length n.
There are n locked computers in a room with labels from 0 to n - 1, each with its own unique password. The password of the computer i has a complexity complexity[i].
The password for the computer labeled 0 is already decrypted and serves as the root. All other computers must be unlocked using it or another previously unlocked computer, following this information:
i using the password for computer j, where j is any integer less than i with a lower complexity. (i.e. j < i and complexity[j] < complexity[i])i, you must have already unlocked a computer j such that j < i and complexity[j] < complexity[i].Find the number of permutations of [0, 1, 2, ..., (n - 1)] that represent a valid order in which the computers can be unlocked, starting from computer 0 as the only initially unlocked one.
Since the answer may be large, return it modulo 109 + 7.
Note that the password for the computer with label 0 is decrypted, and not the computer with the first position in the permutation.
Example 1:
Input: complexity = [1,2,3]
Output: 2
Explanation:
The valid permutations are:
complexity[0] < complexity[1].complexity[1] < complexity[2].complexity[0] < complexity[2].complexity[0] < complexity[1].Example 2:
Input: complexity = [3,3,3,4,4,4]
Output: 0
Explanation:
There are no possible permutations which can unlock all computers.
Constraints:
2 <= complexity.length <= 1051 <= complexity[i] <= 109Problem summary: You are given an array complexity of length n. There are n locked computers in a room with labels from 0 to n - 1, each with its own unique password. The password of the computer i has a complexity complexity[i]. The password for the computer labeled 0 is already decrypted and serves as the root. All other computers must be unlocked using it or another previously unlocked computer, following this information: You can decrypt the password for the computer i using the password for computer j, where j is any integer less than i with a lower complexity. (i.e. j < i and complexity[j] < complexity[i]) To decrypt the password for computer i, you must have already unlocked a computer j such that j < i and complexity[j] < complexity[i]. Find the number of permutations of [0, 1, 2, ..., (n - 1)] that represent a valid order in which the computers can be unlocked, starting from computer 0 as the
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Math
[1,2,3]
[3,3,3,4,4,4]
clumsy-factorial)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3577: Count the Number of Computer Unlocking Permutations
class Solution {
public int countPermutations(int[] complexity) {
final int mod = (int) 1e9 + 7;
long ans = 1;
for (int i = 1; i < complexity.length; ++i) {
if (complexity[i] <= complexity[0]) {
return 0;
}
ans = ans * i % mod;
}
return (int) ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3577: Count the Number of Computer Unlocking Permutations
func countPermutations(complexity []int) int {
mod := int64(1e9 + 7)
ans := int64(1)
for i := 1; i < len(complexity); i++ {
if complexity[i] <= complexity[0] {
return 0
}
ans = ans * int64(i) % mod
}
return int(ans)
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #3577: Count the Number of Computer Unlocking Permutations
class Solution:
def countPermutations(self, complexity: List[int]) -> int:
mod = 10**9 + 7
ans = 1
for i in range(1, len(complexity)):
if complexity[i] <= complexity[0]:
return 0
ans = ans * i % mod
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3577: Count the Number of Computer Unlocking Permutations
impl Solution {
pub fn count_permutations(complexity: Vec<i32>) -> i32 {
const MOD: i64 = 1_000_000_007;
let mut ans = 1i64;
for i in 1..complexity.len() {
if complexity[i] <= complexity[0] {
return 0;
}
ans = ans * i as i64 % MOD;
}
ans as i32
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3577: Count the Number of Computer Unlocking Permutations
function countPermutations(complexity: number[]): number {
const mod = 1e9 + 7;
let ans = 1;
for (let i = 1; i < complexity.length; i++) {
if (complexity[i] <= complexity[0]) {
return 0;
}
ans = (ans * i) % mod;
}
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Temporary multiplications exceed integer bounds.
Usually fails on: Large inputs wrap around unexpectedly.
Fix: Use wider types, modular arithmetic, or rearranged operations.