Overflow in intermediate arithmetic
Wrong move: Temporary multiplications exceed integer bounds.
Usually fails on: Large inputs wrap around unexpectedly.
Fix: Use wider types, modular arithmetic, or rearranged operations.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using math strategy.
You are given n × m grid and an integer k.
A sensor placed on cell (r, c) covers all cells whose Chebyshev distance from (r, c) is at most k.
The Chebyshev distance between two cells (r1, c1) and (r2, c2) is max(|r1 − r2|,|c1 − c2|).
Your task is to return the minimum number of sensors required to cover every cell of the grid.
Example 1:
Input: n = 5, m = 5, k = 1
Output: 4
Explanation:
Placing sensors at positions (0, 3), (1, 0), (3, 3), and (4, 1) ensures every cell in the grid is covered. Thus, the answer is 4.
Example 2:
Input: n = 2, m = 2, k = 2
Output: 1
Explanation:
With k = 2, a single sensor can cover the entire 2 * 2 grid regardless of its position. Thus, the answer is 1.
Constraints:
1 <= n <= 1031 <= m <= 1030 <= k <= 103Problem summary: You are given n × m grid and an integer k. A sensor placed on cell (r, c) covers all cells whose Chebyshev distance from (r, c) is at most k. The Chebyshev distance between two cells (r1, c1) and (r2, c2) is max(|r1 − r2|,|c1 − c2|). Your task is to return the minimum number of sensors required to cover every cell of the grid.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Math
5 5 1
2 2 2
Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3648: Minimum Sensors to Cover Grid
// Auto-generated Java example from go.
class Solution {
public void exampleSolution() {
}
}
// Reference (go):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #3648: Minimum Sensors to Cover Grid
// package main
//
// // https://space.bilibili.com/206214
// func minSensors(n, m, k int) int {
// size := k*2 + 1
// return ((n-1)/size + 1) * ((m-1)/size + 1)
// }
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3648: Minimum Sensors to Cover Grid
package main
// https://space.bilibili.com/206214
func minSensors(n, m, k int) int {
size := k*2 + 1
return ((n-1)/size + 1) * ((m-1)/size + 1)
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #3648: Minimum Sensors to Cover Grid
# Time: O(1)
# Space: O(1)
# math
class Solution(object):
def minSensors(self, n, m, k):
"""
:type n: int
:type m: int
:type k: int
:rtype: int
"""
def ceil_divide(a, b):
return (a+b-1)//b
return ceil_divide(n, 2*k+1)*ceil_divide(m, 2*k+1)
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3648: Minimum Sensors to Cover Grid
// Rust example auto-generated from go reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (go):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #3648: Minimum Sensors to Cover Grid
// package main
//
// // https://space.bilibili.com/206214
// func minSensors(n, m, k int) int {
// size := k*2 + 1
// return ((n-1)/size + 1) * ((m-1)/size + 1)
// }
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3648: Minimum Sensors to Cover Grid
// Auto-generated TypeScript example from go.
function exampleSolution(): void {
}
// Reference (go):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #3648: Minimum Sensors to Cover Grid
// package main
//
// // https://space.bilibili.com/206214
// func minSensors(n, m, k int) int {
// size := k*2 + 1
// return ((n-1)/size + 1) * ((m-1)/size + 1)
// }
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Simulate the process step by step — multiply n times, check each number up to n, or iterate through all possibilities. Each step is O(1), but doing it n times gives O(n). No extra space needed since we just track running state.
Math problems often have a closed-form or O(log n) solution hidden behind an O(n) simulation. Modular arithmetic, fast exponentiation (repeated squaring), GCD (Euclidean algorithm), and number theory properties can dramatically reduce complexity.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Temporary multiplications exceed integer bounds.
Usually fails on: Large inputs wrap around unexpectedly.
Fix: Use wider types, modular arithmetic, or rearranged operations.