Overflow in intermediate arithmetic
Wrong move: Temporary multiplications exceed integer bounds.
Usually fails on: Large inputs wrap around unexpectedly.
Fix: Use wider types, modular arithmetic, or rearranged operations.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using math strategy.
Given two integers n and k, split the number n into exactly k positive integers such that the product of these integers is equal to n.
Return any one split in which the maximum difference between any two numbers is minimized. You may return the result in any order.
Example 1:
Input: n = 100, k = 2
Output: [10,10]
Explanation:
The split [10, 10] yields 10 * 10 = 100 and a max-min difference of 0, which is minimal.
Example 2:
Input: n = 44, k = 3
Output: [2,2,11]
Explanation:
[1, 1, 44] yields a difference of 43[1, 2, 22] yields a difference of 21[1, 4, 11] yields a difference of 10[2, 2, 11] yields a difference of 9Therefore, [2, 2, 11] is the optimal split with the smallest difference 9.
Constraints:
4 <= n <= 1052 <= k <= 5k is strictly less than the total number of positive divisors of n.Problem summary: Given two integers n and k, split the number n into exactly k positive integers such that the product of these integers is equal to n. Return any one split in which the maximum difference between any two numbers is minimized. You may return the result in any order.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Math · Backtracking
100 2
44 3
Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3669: Balanced K-Factor Decomposition
class Solution {
static final int MX = 100_001;
static List<Integer>[] g = new ArrayList[MX];
static {
for (int i = 0; i < MX; i++) {
g[i] = new ArrayList<>();
}
for (int i = 1; i < MX; i++) {
for (int j = i; j < MX; j += i) {
g[j].add(i);
}
}
}
private int cur;
private int[] ans;
private int[] path;
public int[] minDifference(int n, int k) {
cur = Integer.MAX_VALUE;
ans = null;
path = new int[k];
dfs(k - 1, n, Integer.MAX_VALUE, 0);
return ans;
}
private void dfs(int i, int x, int mi, int mx) {
if (i == 0) {
int d = Math.max(mx, x) - Math.min(mi, x);
if (d < cur) {
cur = d;
path[i] = x;
ans = path.clone();
}
return;
}
for (int y : g[x]) {
path[i] = y;
dfs(i - 1, x / y, Math.min(mi, y), Math.max(mx, y));
}
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3669: Balanced K-Factor Decomposition
const MX = 100001
var g [][]int
func init() {
g = make([][]int, MX)
for i := 1; i < MX; i++ {
for j := i; j < MX; j += i {
g[j] = append(g[j], i)
}
}
}
var (
cur int
ans []int
path []int
)
func minDifference(n int, k int) []int {
cur = math.MaxInt32
ans = nil
path = make([]int, k)
dfs(k-1, n, math.MaxInt32, 0)
return ans
}
func dfs(i, x, mi, mx int) {
if i == 0 {
d := max(mx, x) - min(mi, x)
if d < cur {
cur = d
path[i] = x
ans = slices.Clone(path)
}
return
}
for _, y := range g[x] {
path[i] = y
dfs(i-1, x/y, min(mi, y), max(mx, y))
}
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #3669: Balanced K-Factor Decomposition
mx = 10**5 + 1
g = [[] for _ in range(mx)]
for i in range(1, mx):
for j in range(i, mx, i):
g[j].append(i)
class Solution:
def minDifference(self, n: int, k: int) -> List[int]:
def dfs(i: int, x: int, mi: int, mx: int):
if i == 0:
nonlocal cur, ans
d = max(mx, x) - min(mi, x)
if d < cur:
cur = d
path[i] = x
ans = path[:]
return
for y in g[x]:
path[i] = y
dfs(i - 1, x // y, min(mi, y), max(mx, y))
ans = None
path = [0] * k
cur = inf
dfs(k - 1, n, inf, 0)
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3669: Balanced K-Factor Decomposition
// Rust example auto-generated from java reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #3669: Balanced K-Factor Decomposition
// class Solution {
// static final int MX = 100_001;
// static List<Integer>[] g = new ArrayList[MX];
//
// static {
// for (int i = 0; i < MX; i++) {
// g[i] = new ArrayList<>();
// }
// for (int i = 1; i < MX; i++) {
// for (int j = i; j < MX; j += i) {
// g[j].add(i);
// }
// }
// }
//
// private int cur;
// private int[] ans;
// private int[] path;
//
// public int[] minDifference(int n, int k) {
// cur = Integer.MAX_VALUE;
// ans = null;
// path = new int[k];
// dfs(k - 1, n, Integer.MAX_VALUE, 0);
// return ans;
// }
//
// private void dfs(int i, int x, int mi, int mx) {
// if (i == 0) {
// int d = Math.max(mx, x) - Math.min(mi, x);
// if (d < cur) {
// cur = d;
// path[i] = x;
// ans = path.clone();
// }
// return;
// }
// for (int y : g[x]) {
// path[i] = y;
// dfs(i - 1, x / y, Math.min(mi, y), Math.max(mx, y));
// }
// }
// }
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3669: Balanced K-Factor Decomposition
const MX = 100001;
const g: number[][] = Array.from({ length: MX }, () => []);
for (let i = 1; i < MX; i++) {
for (let j = i; j < MX; j += i) {
g[j].push(i);
}
}
function minDifference(n: number, k: number): number[] {
let cur = Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER;
let ans: number[] | null = null;
const path: number[] = Array(k).fill(0);
function dfs(i: number, x: number, mi: number, mx: number): void {
if (i === 0) {
const d = Math.max(mx, x) - Math.min(mi, x);
if (d < cur) {
cur = d;
path[i] = x;
ans = [...path];
}
return;
}
for (const y of g[x]) {
path[i] = y;
dfs(i - 1, Math.floor(x / y), Math.min(mi, y), Math.max(mx, y));
}
}
dfs(k - 1, n, Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER, 0);
return ans ?? [];
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Generate every possible combination without any filtering. At each of n positions we choose from up to n options, giving nⁿ total candidates. Each candidate takes O(n) to validate. No pruning means we waste time on clearly invalid partial solutions.
Backtracking explores a decision tree, but prunes branches that violate constraints early. Worst case is still factorial or exponential, but pruning dramatically reduces the constant factor in practice. Space is the recursion depth (usually O(n) for n-level decisions).
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Temporary multiplications exceed integer bounds.
Usually fails on: Large inputs wrap around unexpectedly.
Fix: Use wider types, modular arithmetic, or rearranged operations.
Wrong move: Mutable state leaks between branches.
Usually fails on: Later branches inherit selections from earlier branches.
Fix: Always revert state changes immediately after recursive call.