Overflow in intermediate arithmetic
Wrong move: Temporary multiplications exceed integer bounds.
Usually fails on: Large inputs wrap around unexpectedly.
Fix: Use wider types, modular arithmetic, or rearranged operations.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on math fundamentals.
You are given a positive integer n.
Let s be the binary representation of n without leading zeros.
The reverse of a binary string s is obtained by writing the characters of s in the opposite order.
You may flip any bit in s (change 0 → 1 or 1 → 0). Each flip affects exactly one bit.
Return the minimum number of flips required to make s equal to the reverse of its original form.
Example 1:
Input: n = 7
Output: 0
Explanation:
The binary representation of 7 is "111". Its reverse is also "111", which is the same. Hence, no flips are needed.
Example 2:
Input: n = 10
Output: 4
Explanation:
The binary representation of 10 is "1010". Its reverse is "0101". All four bits must be flipped to make them equal. Thus, the minimum number of flips required is 4.
Constraints:
1 <= n <= 109Problem summary: You are given a positive integer n. Let s be the binary representation of n without leading zeros. The reverse of a binary string s is obtained by writing the characters of s in the opposite order. You may flip any bit in s (change 0 → 1 or 1 → 0). Each flip affects exactly one bit. Return the minimum number of flips required to make s equal to the reverse of its original form.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Math · Two Pointers · Bit Manipulation
7
10
Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3750: Minimum Number of Flips to Reverse Binary String
class Solution {
public int minimumFlips(int n) {
String s = Integer.toBinaryString(n);
int m = s.length();
int cnt = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < m / 2; i++) {
if (s.charAt(i) != s.charAt(m - i - 1)) {
cnt++;
}
}
return cnt * 2;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3750: Minimum Number of Flips to Reverse Binary String
func minimumFlips(n int) int {
s := strconv.FormatInt(int64(n), 2)
m := len(s)
cnt := 0
for i := 0; i < m/2; i++ {
if s[i] != s[m-i-1] {
cnt++
}
}
return cnt * 2
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #3750: Minimum Number of Flips to Reverse Binary String
class Solution:
def minimumFlips(self, n: int) -> int:
s = bin(n)[2:]
m = len(s)
return sum(s[i] != s[m - i - 1] for i in range(m // 2)) * 2
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3750: Minimum Number of Flips to Reverse Binary String
fn minimum_flips(n: i32) -> i32 {
let s = format!("{n:b}");
let cs : Vec<_> = s.chars().collect();
let reverse : Vec<_> = s.chars().rev().collect();
cs.into_iter().zip(reverse.into_iter()).filter(|(a, b)| a != b).count() as i32
}
fn main() {
let ret = minimum_flips(10);
println!("ret={ret}");
}
#[test]
fn test() {
assert_eq!(minimum_flips(7), 0);
assert_eq!(minimum_flips(10), 4);
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3750: Minimum Number of Flips to Reverse Binary String
function minimumFlips(n: number): number {
const s = n.toString(2);
const m = s.length;
let cnt = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < m / 2; i++) {
if (s[i] !== s[m - i - 1]) {
cnt++;
}
}
return cnt * 2;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair of elements. The outer loop picks one element, the inner loop scans the rest. For n elements that is n × (n−1)/2 comparisons = O(n²). No extra memory — just two loop variables.
Each pointer traverses the array at most once. With two pointers moving inward (or both moving right), the total number of steps is bounded by n. Each comparison is O(1), giving O(n) overall. No auxiliary data structures are needed — just two index variables.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Temporary multiplications exceed integer bounds.
Usually fails on: Large inputs wrap around unexpectedly.
Fix: Use wider types, modular arithmetic, or rearranged operations.
Wrong move: Advancing both pointers shrinks the search space too aggressively and skips candidates.
Usually fails on: A valid pair can be skipped when only one side should move.
Fix: Move exactly one pointer per decision branch based on invariant.