Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using array strategy.
You are given an integer n.
Return the largest prime number less than or equal to n that can be expressed as the sum of one or more consecutive prime numbers starting from 2. If no such number exists, return 0.
Example 1:
Input: n = 20
Output: 17
Explanation:
The prime numbers less than or equal to n = 20 which are consecutive prime sums are:
2 = 2
5 = 2 + 3
17 = 2 + 3 + 5 + 7
The largest is 17, so it is the answer.
Example 2:
Input: n = 2
Output: 2
Explanation:
The only consecutive prime sum less than or equal to 2 is 2 itself.
Constraints:
1 <= n <= 5 * 105Problem summary: You are given an integer n. Return the largest prime number less than or equal to n that can be expressed as the sum of one or more consecutive prime numbers starting from 2. If no such number exists, return 0.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Math
20
2
Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3770: Largest Prime from Consecutive Prime Sum
class Solution {
private static final int MX = 500000;
private static final boolean[] IS_PRIME = new boolean[MX + 1];
private static final List<Integer> PRIMES = new ArrayList<>();
private static final List<Integer> S = new ArrayList<>();
static {
Arrays.fill(IS_PRIME, true);
IS_PRIME[0] = false;
IS_PRIME[1] = false;
for (int i = 2; i <= MX; i++) {
if (IS_PRIME[i]) {
PRIMES.add(i);
if ((long) i * i <= MX) {
for (int j = i * i; j <= MX; j += i) {
IS_PRIME[j] = false;
}
}
}
}
S.add(0);
int t = 0;
for (int x : PRIMES) {
t += x;
if (t > MX) {
break;
}
if (IS_PRIME[t]) {
S.add(t);
}
}
}
public int largestPrime(int n) {
int i = Collections.binarySearch(S, n + 1);
if (i < 0) {
i = ~i;
}
return S.get(i - 1);
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3770: Largest Prime from Consecutive Prime Sum
const MX = 500000
var (
isPrime = make([]bool, MX+1)
primes []int
S []int
)
func init() {
for i := range isPrime {
isPrime[i] = true
}
isPrime[0] = false
isPrime[1] = false
for i := 2; i <= MX; i++ {
if isPrime[i] {
primes = append(primes, i)
if i*i <= MX {
for j := i * i; j <= MX; j += i {
isPrime[j] = false
}
}
}
}
S = append(S, 0)
t := 0
for _, x := range primes {
t += x
if t > MX {
break
}
if isPrime[t] {
S = append(S, t)
}
}
}
func largestPrime(n int) int {
i := sort.SearchInts(S, n+1)
return S[i-1]
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #3770: Largest Prime from Consecutive Prime Sum
mx = 500000
is_prime = [True] * (mx + 1)
is_prime[0] = is_prime[1] = False
primes = []
for i in range(2, mx + 1):
if is_prime[i]:
primes.append(i)
for j in range(i * i, mx + 1, i):
is_prime[j] = False
s = [0]
t = 0
for x in primes:
t += x
if t > mx:
break
if is_prime[t]:
s.append(t)
class Solution:
def largestPrime(self, n: int) -> int:
i = bisect_right(s, n) - 1
return s[i]
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3770: Largest Prime from Consecutive Prime Sum
// Rust example auto-generated from java reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #3770: Largest Prime from Consecutive Prime Sum
// class Solution {
// private static final int MX = 500000;
// private static final boolean[] IS_PRIME = new boolean[MX + 1];
// private static final List<Integer> PRIMES = new ArrayList<>();
// private static final List<Integer> S = new ArrayList<>();
//
// static {
// Arrays.fill(IS_PRIME, true);
// IS_PRIME[0] = false;
// IS_PRIME[1] = false;
//
// for (int i = 2; i <= MX; i++) {
// if (IS_PRIME[i]) {
// PRIMES.add(i);
// if ((long) i * i <= MX) {
// for (int j = i * i; j <= MX; j += i) {
// IS_PRIME[j] = false;
// }
// }
// }
// }
//
// S.add(0);
// int t = 0;
// for (int x : PRIMES) {
// t += x;
// if (t > MX) {
// break;
// }
// if (IS_PRIME[t]) {
// S.add(t);
// }
// }
// }
//
// public int largestPrime(int n) {
// int i = Collections.binarySearch(S, n + 1);
// if (i < 0) {
// i = ~i;
// }
// return S.get(i - 1);
// }
// }
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3770: Largest Prime from Consecutive Prime Sum
const MX = 500000;
const isPrime: boolean[] = Array(MX + 1).fill(true);
isPrime[0] = false;
isPrime[1] = false;
const primes: number[] = [];
const s: number[] = [];
(function init() {
for (let i = 2; i <= MX; i++) {
if (isPrime[i]) {
primes.push(i);
if (i * i <= MX) {
for (let j = i * i; j <= MX; j += i) {
isPrime[j] = false;
}
}
}
}
s.push(0);
let t = 0;
for (const x of primes) {
t += x;
if (t > MX) break;
if (isPrime[t]) {
s.push(t);
}
}
})();
function largestPrime(n: number): number {
const i = _.sortedIndex(s, n + 1) - 1;
return s[i];
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Temporary multiplications exceed integer bounds.
Usually fails on: Large inputs wrap around unexpectedly.
Fix: Use wider types, modular arithmetic, or rearranged operations.