Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using array strategy.
You are given a circular array balance of length n, where balance[i] is the net balance of person i.
In one move, a person can transfer exactly 1 unit of balance to either their left or right neighbor.
Return the minimum number of moves required so that every person has a non-negative balance. If it is impossible, return -1.
Note: You are guaranteed that at most 1 index has a negative balance initially.
Example 1:
Input: balance = [5,1,-4]
Output: 4
Explanation:
One optimal sequence of moves is:
i = 1 to i = 2, resulting in balance = [5, 0, -3]i = 0 to i = 2, resulting in balance = [4, 0, -2]i = 0 to i = 2, resulting in balance = [3, 0, -1]i = 0 to i = 2, resulting in balance = [2, 0, 0]Thus, the minimum number of moves required is 4.
Example 2:
Input: balance = [1,2,-5,2]
Output: 6
Explanation:
One optimal sequence of moves is:
i = 1 to i = 2, resulting in balance = [1, 1, -4, 2]i = 1 to i = 2, resulting in balance = [1, 0, -3, 2]i = 3 to i = 2, resulting in balance = [1, 0, -2, 1]i = 3 to i = 2, resulting in balance = [1, 0, -1, 0]i = 0 to i = 1, resulting in balance = [0, 1, -1, 0]i = 1 to i = 2, resulting in balance = [0, 0, 0, 0]Thus, the minimum number of moves required is 6.
Example 3:
Input: balance = [-3,2]
Output: -1
Explanation:
It is impossible to make all balances non-negative for balance = [-3, 2], so the answer is -1.
Constraints:
1 <= n == balance.length <= 105-109 <= balance[i] <= 109balance initially.Problem summary: You are given a circular array balance of length n, where balance[i] is the net balance of person i. In one move, a person can transfer exactly 1 unit of balance to either their left or right neighbor. Return the minimum number of moves required so that every person has a non-negative balance. If it is impossible, return -1. Note: You are guaranteed that at most 1 index has a negative balance initially.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Greedy
[5,1,-4]
[1,2,-5,2]
[-3,2]
Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3776: Minimum Moves to Balance Circular Array
class Solution {
public long minMoves(int[] balance) {
long sum = 0;
for (int b : balance) {
sum += b;
}
if (sum < 0) {
return -1;
}
int n = balance.length;
int mn = balance[0];
int idx = 0;
for (int i = 1; i < n; i++) {
if (balance[i] < mn) {
mn = balance[i];
idx = i;
}
}
if (mn >= 0) {
return 0;
}
int need = -mn;
long ans = 0;
for (int j = 1; j < n; j++) {
int a = balance[(idx - j + n) % n];
int b = balance[(idx + j) % n];
int c1 = Math.min(a, need);
need -= c1;
ans += (long) c1 * j;
int c2 = Math.min(b, need);
need -= c2;
ans += (long) c2 * j;
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3776: Minimum Moves to Balance Circular Array
func minMoves(balance []int) int64 {
var sum int64
for _, b := range balance {
sum += int64(b)
}
if sum < 0 {
return -1
}
n := len(balance)
mn := balance[0]
idx := 0
for i := 1; i < n; i++ {
if balance[i] < mn {
mn = balance[i]
idx = i
}
}
if mn >= 0 {
return 0
}
need := -mn
var ans int64
for j := 1; j < n; j++ {
a := balance[(idx-j+n)%n]
b := balance[(idx+j)%n]
c1 := min(a, need)
need -= c1
ans += int64(c1) * int64(j)
c2 := min(b, need)
need -= c2
ans += int64(c2) * int64(j)
}
return ans
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #3776: Minimum Moves to Balance Circular Array
class Solution:
def minMoves(self, balance: List[int]) -> int:
if sum(balance) < 0:
return -1
mn = min(balance)
if mn >= 0:
return 0
need = -mn
i = balance.index(mn)
n = len(balance)
ans = 0
for j in range(1, n):
a = balance[(i - j + n) % n]
b = balance[(i + j - n) % n]
c1 = min(a, need)
need -= c1
ans += c1 * j
c2 = min(b, need)
need -= c2
ans += c2 * j
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3776: Minimum Moves to Balance Circular Array
// Rust example auto-generated from java reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #3776: Minimum Moves to Balance Circular Array
// class Solution {
// public long minMoves(int[] balance) {
// long sum = 0;
// for (int b : balance) {
// sum += b;
// }
// if (sum < 0) {
// return -1;
// }
//
// int n = balance.length;
// int mn = balance[0];
// int idx = 0;
// for (int i = 1; i < n; i++) {
// if (balance[i] < mn) {
// mn = balance[i];
// idx = i;
// }
// }
//
// if (mn >= 0) {
// return 0;
// }
//
// int need = -mn;
// long ans = 0;
//
// for (int j = 1; j < n; j++) {
// int a = balance[(idx - j + n) % n];
// int b = balance[(idx + j) % n];
//
// int c1 = Math.min(a, need);
// need -= c1;
// ans += (long) c1 * j;
//
// int c2 = Math.min(b, need);
// need -= c2;
// ans += (long) c2 * j;
// }
//
// return ans;
// }
// }
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3776: Minimum Moves to Balance Circular Array
function minMoves(balance: number[]): number {
const sum = balance.reduce((a, b) => a + b, 0);
if (sum < 0) {
return -1;
}
const n = balance.length;
let mn = balance[0],
idx = 0;
for (let i = 1; i < n; i++) {
if (balance[i] < mn) {
mn = balance[i];
idx = i;
}
}
if (mn >= 0) {
return 0;
}
let need = -mn;
let ans = 0;
for (let j = 1; j < n; j++) {
const a = balance[(idx - j + n) % n];
const b = balance[(idx + j) % n];
const c1 = Math.min(a, need);
need -= c1;
ans += c1 * j;
const c2 = Math.min(b, need);
need -= c2;
ans += c2 * j;
}
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Try every possible combination of choices. With n items each having two states (include/exclude), the search space is 2ⁿ. Evaluating each combination takes O(n), giving O(n × 2ⁿ). The recursion stack or subset storage uses O(n) space.
Greedy algorithms typically sort the input (O(n log n)) then make a single pass (O(n)). The sort dominates. If the input is already sorted or the greedy choice can be computed without sorting, time drops to O(n). Proving greedy correctness (exchange argument) is harder than the implementation.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Locally optimal choices may fail globally.
Usually fails on: Counterexamples appear on crafted input orderings.
Fix: Verify with exchange argument or monotonic objective before committing.