Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using array strategy.
You are given a positive integer array nums.
For a positive integer k, define nonPositive(nums, k) as the minimum number of operations needed to make every element of nums non-positive. In one operation, you can choose an index i and reduce nums[i] by k.
Return an integer denoting the minimum value of k such that nonPositive(nums, k) <= k2.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [3,7,5]
Output: 3
Explanation:
When k = 3, nonPositive(nums, k) = 6 <= k2.
nums[0] = 3 one time. nums[0] becomes 3 - 3 = 0.nums[1] = 7 three times. nums[1] becomes 7 - 3 - 3 - 3 = -2.nums[2] = 5 two times. nums[2] becomes 5 - 3 - 3 = -1.Example 2:
Input: nums = [1]
Output: 1
Explanation:
When k = 1, nonPositive(nums, k) = 1 <= k2.
nums[0] = 1 one time. nums[0] becomes 1 - 1 = 0.Constraints:
1 <= nums.length <= 1051 <= nums[i] <= 105Problem summary: You are given a positive integer array nums. For a positive integer k, define nonPositive(nums, k) as the minimum number of operations needed to make every element of nums non-positive. In one operation, you can choose an index i and reduce nums[i] by k. Return an integer denoting the minimum value of k such that nonPositive(nums, k) <= k2.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Binary Search
[3,7,5]
[1]
Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3824: Minimum K to Reduce Array Within Limit
class Solution {
public int minimumK(int[] nums) {
int l = 1, r = 100000;
while (l < r) {
int mid = (l + r) >> 1;
if (check(nums, mid)) {
r = mid;
} else {
l = mid + 1;
}
}
return l;
}
private boolean check(int[] nums, int k) {
long t = 0;
for (int x : nums) {
t += (x + k - 1) / k;
}
return t <= 1L * k * k;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3824: Minimum K to Reduce Array Within Limit
func minimumK(nums []int) int {
check := func(k int) bool {
t := 0
for _, x := range nums {
t += (x + k - 1) / k
}
return t <= k*k
}
return sort.Search(100000, func(k int) bool {
if k == 0 {
return false
}
return check(k)
})
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #3824: Minimum K to Reduce Array Within Limit
class Solution:
def minimumK(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
def check(k: int) -> bool:
t = 0
for x in nums:
t += (x + k - 1) // k
return t <= k * k
l, r = 1, 10**5
while l < r:
mid = (l + r) >> 1
if check(mid):
r = mid
else:
l = mid + 1
return l
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3824: Minimum K to Reduce Array Within Limit
// Rust example auto-generated from java reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #3824: Minimum K to Reduce Array Within Limit
// class Solution {
// public int minimumK(int[] nums) {
// int l = 1, r = 100000;
// while (l < r) {
// int mid = (l + r) >> 1;
// if (check(nums, mid)) {
// r = mid;
// } else {
// l = mid + 1;
// }
// }
// return l;
// }
//
// private boolean check(int[] nums, int k) {
// long t = 0;
// for (int x : nums) {
// t += (x + k - 1) / k;
// }
// return t <= 1L * k * k;
// }
// }
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3824: Minimum K to Reduce Array Within Limit
function minimumK(nums: number[]): number {
const check = (k: number): boolean => {
let t = 0;
for (const x of nums) {
t += Math.floor((x + k - 1) / k);
}
return t <= k * k;
};
let l = 1,
r = 100000;
while (l < r) {
const mid = (l + r) >> 1;
if (check(mid)) {
r = mid;
} else {
l = mid + 1;
}
}
return l;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Check every element from left to right until we find the target or exhaust the array. Each comparison is O(1), and we may visit all n elements, giving O(n). No extra space needed.
Each comparison eliminates half the remaining search space. After k comparisons, the space is n/2ᵏ. We stop when the space is 1, so k = log₂ n. No extra memory needed — just two pointers (lo, hi).
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Setting `lo = mid` or `hi = mid` can stall and create an infinite loop.
Usually fails on: Two-element ranges never converge.
Fix: Use `lo = mid + 1` or `hi = mid - 1` where appropriate.