Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on bit manipulation fundamentals.
You are given an integer n.
An integer is called Monobit if all bits in its binary representation are the same.
Return the count of Monobit integers in the range [0, n] (inclusive).
Example 1:
Input: n = 1
Output: 2
Explanation:
[0, 1] have binary representations "0" and "1".Example 2:
Input: n = 4
Output: 3
Explanation:
[0, 4] include binaries "0", "1", "10", "11", and "100".Constraints:
0 <= n <= 1000Problem summary: You are given an integer n. An integer is called Monobit if all bits in its binary representation are the same. Return the count of Monobit integers in the range [0, n] (inclusive).
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Bit Manipulation
1
4
Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3827: Count Monobit Integers
class Solution {
public int countMonobit(int n) {
int ans = 1;
for (int i = 1, x = 1; x <= n; ++i) {
++ans;
x += (1 << i);
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3827: Count Monobit Integers
func countMonobit(n int) (ans int) {
ans = 1
for i, x := 1, 1; x <= n; i++ {
ans++
x += (1 << i)
}
return
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #3827: Count Monobit Integers
class Solution:
def countMonobit(self, n: int) -> int:
ans = x = 1
i = 1
while x <= n:
ans += 1
x += 1 << i
i += 1
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3827: Count Monobit Integers
// Rust example auto-generated from java reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #3827: Count Monobit Integers
// class Solution {
// public int countMonobit(int n) {
// int ans = 1;
// for (int i = 1, x = 1; x <= n; ++i) {
// ++ans;
// x += (1 << i);
// }
// return ans;
// }
// }
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3827: Count Monobit Integers
function countMonobit(n: number): number {
let ans = 1;
for (let i = 1, x = 1; x <= n; ++i) {
++ans;
x += 1 << i;
}
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Sort the array in O(n log n), then scan for the missing or unique element by comparing adjacent pairs. Sorting requires O(n) auxiliary space (or O(1) with in-place sort but O(n log n) time remains). The sort step dominates.
Bitwise operations (AND, OR, XOR, shifts) are O(1) per operation on fixed-width integers. A single pass through the input with bit operations gives O(n) time. The key insight: XOR of a number with itself is 0, which eliminates duplicates without extra space.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.