Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Break down a hard problem into reliable checkpoints, edge-case handling, and complexity trade-offs.
You are given an integer array nums, and an integer k.
Start with an initial value val = 1 and process nums from left to right. At each index i, you must choose exactly one of the following actions:
val by nums[i].val by nums[i].val unchanged.After processing all elements, val is considered equal to k only if its final rational value exactly equals k.
Return the count of distinct sequences of choices that result in val == k.
Note: Division is rational (exact), not integer division. For example, 2 / 4 = 1 / 2.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [2,3,2], k = 6
Output: 2
Explanation:
The following 2 distinct sequences of choices result in val == k:
| Sequence | Operation on nums[0] |
Operation on nums[1] |
Operation on nums[2] |
Final val |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Multiply: val = 1 * 2 = 2 |
Multiply: val = 2 * 3 = 6 |
Leave val unchanged |
6 |
| 2 | Leave val unchanged |
Multiply: val = 1 * 3 = 3 |
Multiply: val = 3 * 2 = 6 |
6 |
Example 2:
Input: nums = [4,6,3], k = 2
Output: 2
Explanation:
The following 2 distinct sequences of choices result in val == k:
| Sequence | Operation on nums[0] |
Operation on nums[1] |
Operation on nums[2] |
Final val |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Multiply: val = 1 * 4 = 4 |
Divide: val = 4 / 6 = 2 / 3 |
Multiply: val = (2 / 3) * 3 = 2 |
2 |
| 2 | Leave val unchanged |
Multiply: val = 1 * 6 = 6 |
Divide: val = 6 / 3 = 2 |
2 |
Example 3:
Input: nums = [1,5], k = 1
Output: 3
Explanation:
The following 3 distinct sequences of choices result in val == k:
| Sequence | Operation on nums[0] |
Operation on nums[1] |
Final val |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Multiply: val = 1 * 1 = 1 |
Leave val unchanged |
1 |
| 2 | Divide: val = 1 / 1 = 1 |
Leave val unchanged |
1 |
| 3 | Leave val unchanged |
Leave val unchanged |
1 |
Constraints:
1 <= nums.length <= 191 <= nums[i] <= 61 <= k <= 1015Problem summary: You are given an integer array nums, and an integer k. Start with an initial value val = 1 and process nums from left to right. At each index i, you must choose exactly one of the following actions: Multiply val by nums[i]. Divide val by nums[i]. Leave val unchanged. After processing all elements, val is considered equal to k only if its final rational value exactly equals k. Return the count of distinct sequences of choices that result in val == k. Note: Division is rational (exact), not integer division. For example, 2 / 4 = 1 / 2.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: General problem-solving
[2,3,2] 6
[4,6,3] 2
[1,5] 1
Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3850: Count Sequences to K
class Solution {
record State(int i, long p, long q) {
}
private Map<State, Integer> f;
private int[] nums;
private int n;
private long k;
public int countSequences(int[] nums, long k) {
this.nums = nums;
this.n = nums.length;
this.k = k;
this.f = new HashMap<>();
return dfs(0, 1L, 1L);
}
private int dfs(int i, long p, long q) {
if (i == n) {
return (p == k && q == 1L) ? 1 : 0;
}
State key = new State(i, p, q);
if (f.containsKey(key)) {
return f.get(key);
}
int res = dfs(i + 1, p, q);
long x = nums[i];
long g1 = gcd(p * x, q);
res += dfs(i + 1, (p * x) / g1, q / g1);
long g2 = gcd(p, q * x);
res += dfs(i + 1, p / g2, (q * x) / g2);
f.put(key, res);
return res;
}
private long gcd(long a, long b) {
while (b != 0) {
long t = a % b;
a = b;
b = t;
}
return a;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3850: Count Sequences to K
func countSequences(nums []int, k int64) int {
n := len(nums)
type state struct {
i int
p int64
q int64
}
f := make(map[state]int)
var gcd func(int64, int64) int64
gcd = func(a, b int64) int64 {
for b != 0 {
a, b = b, a%b
}
return a
}
var dfs func(int, int64, int64) int
dfs = func(i int, p int64, q int64) int {
if i == n {
if p == k && q == 1 {
return 1
}
return 0
}
key := state{i, p, q}
if v, ok := f[key]; ok {
return v
}
res := dfs(i+1, p, q)
x := int64(nums[i])
g1 := gcd(p*x, q)
res += dfs(i+1, (p*x)/g1, q/g1)
g2 := gcd(p, q*x)
res += dfs(i+1, p/g2, (q*x)/g2)
f[key] = res
return res
}
return dfs(0, 1, 1)
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #3850: Count Sequences to K
class Solution:
def countSequences(self, nums: List[int], k: int) -> int:
@cache
def dfs(i: int, p: int, q: int) -> int:
if i == n:
return 1 if p == k and q == 1 else 0
x = nums[i]
res = dfs(i + 1, p, q)
g = gcd(p * x, q)
res += dfs(i + 1, p * x // g, q // g)
g = gcd(p, q * x)
res += dfs(i + 1, p // g, q * x // g)
return res
n = len(nums)
ans = dfs(0, 1, 1)
dfs.cache_clear()
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3850: Count Sequences to K
// Rust example auto-generated from java reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #3850: Count Sequences to K
// class Solution {
//
// record State(int i, long p, long q) {
// }
//
// private Map<State, Integer> f;
// private int[] nums;
// private int n;
// private long k;
//
// public int countSequences(int[] nums, long k) {
// this.nums = nums;
// this.n = nums.length;
// this.k = k;
// this.f = new HashMap<>();
// return dfs(0, 1L, 1L);
// }
//
// private int dfs(int i, long p, long q) {
// if (i == n) {
// return (p == k && q == 1L) ? 1 : 0;
// }
//
// State key = new State(i, p, q);
// if (f.containsKey(key)) {
// return f.get(key);
// }
//
// int res = dfs(i + 1, p, q);
//
// long x = nums[i];
//
// long g1 = gcd(p * x, q);
// res += dfs(i + 1, (p * x) / g1, q / g1);
//
// long g2 = gcd(p, q * x);
// res += dfs(i + 1, p / g2, (q * x) / g2);
//
// f.put(key, res);
// return res;
// }
//
// private long gcd(long a, long b) {
// while (b != 0) {
// long t = a % b;
// a = b;
// b = t;
// }
// return a;
// }
// }
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3850: Count Sequences to K
function countSequences(nums: number[], k: number): number {
const n = nums.length;
const f = new Map<string, number>();
function gcd(a: number, b: number): number {
while (b !== 0) {
const t = a % b;
a = b;
b = t;
}
return a;
}
function dfs(i: number, p: number, q: number): number {
if (i === n) {
return p === k && q === 1 ? 1 : 0;
}
const key = `${i},${p},${q}`;
if (f.has(key)) return f.get(key)!;
let res = dfs(i + 1, p, q);
const x = nums[i];
const g1 = gcd(p * x, q);
res += dfs(i + 1, (p * x) / g1, q / g1);
const g2 = gcd(p, q * x);
res += dfs(i + 1, p / g2, (q * x) / g2);
f.set(key, res);
return res;
}
return dfs(0, 1, 1);
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.