Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using array strategy.
You are given an array of intervals, where intervals[i] = [starti, endi] and each starti is unique.
The right interval for an interval i is an interval j such that startj >= endi and startj is minimized. Note that i may equal j.
Return an array of right interval indices for each interval i. If no right interval exists for interval i, then put -1 at index i.
Example 1:
Input: intervals = [[1,2]] Output: [-1] Explanation: There is only one interval in the collection, so it outputs -1.
Example 2:
Input: intervals = [[3,4],[2,3],[1,2]] Output: [-1,0,1] Explanation: There is no right interval for [3,4]. The right interval for [2,3] is [3,4] since start0 = 3 is the smallest start that is >= end1 = 3. The right interval for [1,2] is [2,3] since start1 = 2 is the smallest start that is >= end2 = 2.
Example 3:
Input: intervals = [[1,4],[2,3],[3,4]] Output: [-1,2,-1] Explanation: There is no right interval for [1,4] and [3,4]. The right interval for [2,3] is [3,4] since start2 = 3 is the smallest start that is >= end1 = 3.
Constraints:
1 <= intervals.length <= 2 * 104intervals[i].length == 2-106 <= starti <= endi <= 106Problem summary: You are given an array of intervals, where intervals[i] = [starti, endi] and each starti is unique. The right interval for an interval i is an interval j such that startj >= endi and startj is minimized. Note that i may equal j. Return an array of right interval indices for each interval i. If no right interval exists for interval i, then put -1 at index i.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Binary Search
[[1,2]]
[[3,4],[2,3],[1,2]]
[[1,4],[2,3],[3,4]]
data-stream-as-disjoint-intervals)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #436: Find Right Interval
class Solution {
public int[] findRightInterval(int[][] intervals) {
int n = intervals.length;
int[][] arr = new int[n][0];
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
arr[i] = new int[] {intervals[i][0], i};
}
Arrays.sort(arr, (a, b) -> a[0] - b[0]);
int[] ans = new int[n];
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
int j = search(arr, intervals[i][1]);
ans[i] = j < n ? arr[j][1] : -1;
}
return ans;
}
private int search(int[][] arr, int x) {
int l = 0, r = arr.length;
while (l < r) {
int mid = (l + r) >> 1;
if (arr[mid][0] >= x) {
r = mid;
} else {
l = mid + 1;
}
}
return l;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #436: Find Right Interval
func findRightInterval(intervals [][]int) (ans []int) {
arr := make([][2]int, len(intervals))
for i, v := range intervals {
arr[i] = [2]int{v[0], i}
}
sort.Slice(arr, func(i, j int) bool { return arr[i][0] < arr[j][0] })
for _, e := range intervals {
j := sort.Search(len(arr), func(i int) bool { return arr[i][0] >= e[1] })
if j < len(arr) {
ans = append(ans, arr[j][1])
} else {
ans = append(ans, -1)
}
}
return
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #436: Find Right Interval
class Solution:
def findRightInterval(self, intervals: List[List[int]]) -> List[int]:
n = len(intervals)
ans = [-1] * n
arr = sorted((st, i) for i, (st, _) in enumerate(intervals))
for i, (_, ed) in enumerate(intervals):
j = bisect_left(arr, (ed, -inf))
if j < n:
ans[i] = arr[j][1]
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #436: Find Right Interval
struct Solution;
use std::collections::BTreeMap;
impl Solution {
fn find_right_interval(intervals: Vec<Vec<i32>>) -> Vec<i32> {
let n = intervals.len();
let mut res: Vec<i32> = vec![-1; n];
let mut btm: BTreeMap<i32, usize> = BTreeMap::new();
for i in 0..n {
let l = intervals[i][0];
btm.insert(l, i);
}
for i in 0..n {
let r = intervals[i][1];
for (_, &j) in btm.range(r..).take(1) {
res[i] = j as i32;
}
}
res
}
}
#[test]
fn test() {
let intervals = vec_vec_i32![[1, 2]];
let res = vec![-1];
assert_eq!(Solution::find_right_interval(intervals), res);
let intervals = vec_vec_i32![[3, 4], [2, 3], [1, 2]];
let res = vec![-1, 0, 1];
assert_eq!(Solution::find_right_interval(intervals), res);
let intervals = vec_vec_i32![[1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]];
let res = vec![-1, 2, -1];
assert_eq!(Solution::find_right_interval(intervals), res);
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #436: Find Right Interval
function findRightInterval(intervals: number[][]): number[] {
const n = intervals.length;
const arr: number[][] = Array.from({ length: n }, (_, i) => [intervals[i][0], i]);
arr.sort((a, b) => a[0] - b[0]);
return intervals.map(([_, ed]) => {
let [l, r] = [0, n];
while (l < r) {
const mid = (l + r) >> 1;
if (arr[mid][0] >= ed) {
r = mid;
} else {
l = mid + 1;
}
}
return l < n ? arr[l][1] : -1;
});
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Check every element from left to right until we find the target or exhaust the array. Each comparison is O(1), and we may visit all n elements, giving O(n). No extra space needed.
Each comparison eliminates half the remaining search space. After k comparisons, the space is n/2ᵏ. We stop when the space is 1, so k = log₂ n. No extra memory needed — just two pointers (lo, hi).
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Setting `lo = mid` or `hi = mid` can stall and create an infinite loop.
Usually fails on: Two-element ranges never converge.
Fix: Use `lo = mid + 1` or `hi = mid - 1` where appropriate.