Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using array strategy.
You are given a 0-indexed array of positive integers w where w[i] describes the weight of the ith index.
You need to implement the function pickIndex(), which randomly picks an index in the range [0, w.length - 1] (inclusive) and returns it. The probability of picking an index i is w[i] / sum(w).
w = [1, 3], the probability of picking index 0 is 1 / (1 + 3) = 0.25 (i.e., 25%), and the probability of picking index 1 is 3 / (1 + 3) = 0.75 (i.e., 75%).Example 1:
Input ["Solution","pickIndex"] [[[1]],[]] Output [null,0] Explanation Solution solution = new Solution([1]); solution.pickIndex(); // return 0. The only option is to return 0 since there is only one element in w.
Example 2:
Input ["Solution","pickIndex","pickIndex","pickIndex","pickIndex","pickIndex"] [[[1,3]],[],[],[],[],[]] Output [null,1,1,1,1,0] Explanation Solution solution = new Solution([1, 3]); solution.pickIndex(); // return 1. It is returning the second element (index = 1) that has a probability of 3/4. solution.pickIndex(); // return 1 solution.pickIndex(); // return 1 solution.pickIndex(); // return 1 solution.pickIndex(); // return 0. It is returning the first element (index = 0) that has a probability of 1/4. Since this is a randomization problem, multiple answers are allowed. All of the following outputs can be considered correct: [null,1,1,1,1,0] [null,1,1,1,1,1] [null,1,1,1,0,0] [null,1,1,1,0,1] [null,1,0,1,0,0] ...... and so on.
Constraints:
1 <= w.length <= 1041 <= w[i] <= 105pickIndex will be called at most 104 times.Problem summary: You are given a 0-indexed array of positive integers w where w[i] describes the weight of the ith index. You need to implement the function pickIndex(), which randomly picks an index in the range [0, w.length - 1] (inclusive) and returns it. The probability of picking an index i is w[i] / sum(w). For example, if w = [1, 3], the probability of picking index 0 is 1 / (1 + 3) = 0.25 (i.e., 25%), and the probability of picking index 1 is 3 / (1 + 3) = 0.75 (i.e., 75%).
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Math · Binary Search
["Solution","pickIndex"] [[[1]],[]]
["Solution","pickIndex","pickIndex","pickIndex","pickIndex","pickIndex"] [[[1,3]],[],[],[],[],[]]
random-pick-index)random-pick-with-blacklist)random-point-in-non-overlapping-rectangles)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #528: Random Pick with Weight
class Solution {
private int[] s;
private Random random = new Random();
public Solution(int[] w) {
int n = w.length;
s = new int[n + 1];
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
s[i + 1] = s[i] + w[i];
}
}
public int pickIndex() {
int x = 1 + random.nextInt(s[s.length - 1]);
int left = 1, right = s.length - 1;
while (left < right) {
int mid = (left + right) >> 1;
if (s[mid] >= x) {
right = mid;
} else {
left = mid + 1;
}
}
return left - 1;
}
}
/**
* Your Solution object will be instantiated and called as such:
* Solution obj = new Solution(w);
* int param_1 = obj.pickIndex();
*/
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #528: Random Pick with Weight
type Solution struct {
s []int
}
func Constructor(w []int) Solution {
n := len(w)
s := make([]int, n+1)
for i := 0; i < n; i++ {
s[i+1] = s[i] + w[i]
}
return Solution{s}
}
func (this *Solution) PickIndex() int {
n := len(this.s)
x := 1 + rand.Intn(this.s[n-1])
left, right := 1, n-1
for left < right {
mid := (left + right) >> 1
if this.s[mid] >= x {
right = mid
} else {
left = mid + 1
}
}
return left - 1
}
/**
* Your Solution object will be instantiated and called as such:
* obj := Constructor(w);
* param_1 := obj.PickIndex();
*/
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #528: Random Pick with Weight
class Solution:
def __init__(self, w: List[int]):
self.s = [0]
for c in w:
self.s.append(self.s[-1] + c)
def pickIndex(self) -> int:
x = random.randint(1, self.s[-1])
left, right = 1, len(self.s) - 1
while left < right:
mid = (left + right) >> 1
if self.s[mid] >= x:
right = mid
else:
left = mid + 1
return left - 1
# Your Solution object will be instantiated and called as such:
# obj = Solution(w)
# param_1 = obj.pickIndex()
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #528: Random Pick with Weight
use rand::{thread_rng, Rng};
struct Solution {
sum: Vec<i32>,
}
/**
* `&self` means the method takes an immutable reference.
* If you need a mutable reference, change it to `&mut self` instead.
*/
impl Solution {
fn new(w: Vec<i32>) -> Self {
let n = w.len();
let mut sum = vec![0; n + 1];
for i in 1..=n {
sum[i] = sum[i - 1] + w[i - 1];
}
Self { sum }
}
fn pick_index(&self) -> i32 {
let x = thread_rng().gen_range(1, self.sum.last().unwrap() + 1);
let (mut left, mut right) = (1, self.sum.len() - 1);
while left < right {
let mid = (left + right) >> 1;
if self.sum[mid] < x {
left = mid + 1;
} else {
right = mid;
}
}
(left - 1) as i32
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #528: Random Pick with Weight
// Auto-generated TypeScript example from java.
function exampleSolution(): void {
}
// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #528: Random Pick with Weight
// class Solution {
// private int[] s;
// private Random random = new Random();
//
// public Solution(int[] w) {
// int n = w.length;
// s = new int[n + 1];
// for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
// s[i + 1] = s[i] + w[i];
// }
// }
//
// public int pickIndex() {
// int x = 1 + random.nextInt(s[s.length - 1]);
// int left = 1, right = s.length - 1;
// while (left < right) {
// int mid = (left + right) >> 1;
// if (s[mid] >= x) {
// right = mid;
// } else {
// left = mid + 1;
// }
// }
// return left - 1;
// }
// }
//
// /**
// * Your Solution object will be instantiated and called as such:
// * Solution obj = new Solution(w);
// * int param_1 = obj.pickIndex();
// */
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Check every element from left to right until we find the target or exhaust the array. Each comparison is O(1), and we may visit all n elements, giving O(n). No extra space needed.
Each comparison eliminates half the remaining search space. After k comparisons, the space is n/2ᵏ. We stop when the space is 1, so k = log₂ n. No extra memory needed — just two pointers (lo, hi).
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Temporary multiplications exceed integer bounds.
Usually fails on: Large inputs wrap around unexpectedly.
Fix: Use wider types, modular arithmetic, or rearranged operations.
Wrong move: Setting `lo = mid` or `hi = mid` can stall and create an infinite loop.
Usually fails on: Two-element ranges never converge.
Fix: Use `lo = mid + 1` or `hi = mid - 1` where appropriate.