Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on core interview patterns fundamentals.
Table: Employee
+-------------+---------+ | Column Name | Type | +-------------+---------+ | empId | int | | name | varchar | | supervisor | int | | salary | int | +-------------+---------+ empId is the column with unique values for this table. Each row of this table indicates the name and the ID of an employee in addition to their salary and the id of their manager.
Table: Bonus
+-------------+------+ | Column Name | Type | +-------------+------+ | empId | int | | bonus | int | +-------------+------+ empId is the column of unique values for this table. empId is a foreign key (reference column) to empId from the Employee table. Each row of this table contains the id of an employee and their respective bonus.
Write a solution to report the name and bonus amount of each employee who satisfies either of the following:
1000.Return the result table in any order.
The result format is in the following example.
Example 1:
Input: Employee table: +-------+--------+------------+--------+ | empId | name | supervisor | salary | +-------+--------+------------+--------+ | 3 | Brad | null | 4000 | | 1 | John | 3 | 1000 | | 2 | Dan | 3 | 2000 | | 4 | Thomas | 3 | 4000 | +-------+--------+------------+--------+ Bonus table: +-------+-------+ | empId | bonus | +-------+-------+ | 2 | 500 | | 4 | 2000 | +-------+-------+ Output: +------+-------+ | name | bonus | +------+-------+ | Brad | null | | John | null | | Dan | 500 | +------+-------+
Problem summary: Table: Employee +-------------+---------+ | Column Name | Type | +-------------+---------+ | empId | int | | name | varchar | | supervisor | int | | salary | int | +-------------+---------+ empId is the column with unique values for this table. Each row of this table indicates the name and the ID of an employee in addition to their salary and the id of their manager. Table: Bonus +-------------+------+ | Column Name | Type | +-------------+------+ | empId | int | | bonus | int | +-------------+------+ empId is the column of unique values for this table. empId is a foreign key (reference column) to empId from the Employee table. Each row of this table contains the id of an employee and their respective bonus. Write a solution to report the name and bonus amount of each employee who satisfies either of the following: The employee has a bonus less than 1000. The employee did not get any
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: General problem-solving
{"headers":{"Employee":["empId","name","supervisor","salary"],"Bonus":["empId","bonus"]},"rows":{"Employee":[[3,"Brad",null,4000],[1,"John",3,1000],[2,"Dan",3,2000],[4,"Thomas",3,4000]],"Bonus":[[2,500],[4,2000]]}}combine-two-tables)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #577: Employee Bonus
// Auto-generated Java example from rust.
class Solution {
public void exampleSolution() {
}
}
// Reference (rust):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #577: Employee Bonus
// pub fn sql_example() -> &'static str {
// r#"
// -- Accepted solution for LeetCode #577: Employee Bonus
// # Write your MySQL query statement below
// SELECT name, bonus
// FROM
// Employee
// LEFT JOIN Bonus USING (empId)
// WHERE IFNULL(bonus, 0) < 1000;
// "#
// }
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #577: Employee Bonus
// Auto-generated Go example from rust.
func exampleSolution() {
}
// Reference (rust):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #577: Employee Bonus
// pub fn sql_example() -> &'static str {
// r#"
// -- Accepted solution for LeetCode #577: Employee Bonus
// # Write your MySQL query statement below
// SELECT name, bonus
// FROM
// Employee
// LEFT JOIN Bonus USING (empId)
// WHERE IFNULL(bonus, 0) < 1000;
// "#
// }
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #577: Employee Bonus
# Auto-generated Python example from rust.
def example_solution() -> None:
return
# Reference (rust):
# // Accepted solution for LeetCode #577: Employee Bonus
# pub fn sql_example() -> &'static str {
# r#"
# -- Accepted solution for LeetCode #577: Employee Bonus
# # Write your MySQL query statement below
# SELECT name, bonus
# FROM
# Employee
# LEFT JOIN Bonus USING (empId)
# WHERE IFNULL(bonus, 0) < 1000;
# "#
# }
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #577: Employee Bonus
pub fn sql_example() -> &'static str {
r#"
-- Accepted solution for LeetCode #577: Employee Bonus
# Write your MySQL query statement below
SELECT name, bonus
FROM
Employee
LEFT JOIN Bonus USING (empId)
WHERE IFNULL(bonus, 0) < 1000;
"#
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #577: Employee Bonus
// Auto-generated TypeScript example from rust.
function exampleSolution(): void {
}
// Reference (rust):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #577: Employee Bonus
// pub fn sql_example() -> &'static str {
// r#"
// -- Accepted solution for LeetCode #577: Employee Bonus
// # Write your MySQL query statement below
// SELECT name, bonus
// FROM
// Employee
// LEFT JOIN Bonus USING (empId)
// WHERE IFNULL(bonus, 0) < 1000;
// "#
// }
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.