Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on array fundamentals.
An image smoother is a filter of the size 3 x 3 that can be applied to each cell of an image by rounding down the average of the cell and the eight surrounding cells (i.e., the average of the nine cells in the blue smoother). If one or more of the surrounding cells of a cell is not present, we do not consider it in the average (i.e., the average of the four cells in the red smoother).
Given an m x n integer matrix img representing the grayscale of an image, return the image after applying the smoother on each cell of it.
Example 1:
Input: img = [[1,1,1],[1,0,1],[1,1,1]] Output: [[0,0,0],[0,0,0],[0,0,0]] Explanation: For the points (0,0), (0,2), (2,0), (2,2): floor(3/4) = floor(0.75) = 0 For the points (0,1), (1,0), (1,2), (2,1): floor(5/6) = floor(0.83333333) = 0 For the point (1,1): floor(8/9) = floor(0.88888889) = 0
Example 2:
Input: img = [[100,200,100],[200,50,200],[100,200,100]] Output: [[137,141,137],[141,138,141],[137,141,137]] Explanation: For the points (0,0), (0,2), (2,0), (2,2): floor((100+200+200+50)/4) = floor(137.5) = 137 For the points (0,1), (1,0), (1,2), (2,1): floor((200+200+50+200+100+100)/6) = floor(141.666667) = 141 For the point (1,1): floor((50+200+200+200+200+100+100+100+100)/9) = floor(138.888889) = 138
Constraints:
m == img.lengthn == img[i].length1 <= m, n <= 2000 <= img[i][j] <= 255Problem summary: An image smoother is a filter of the size 3 x 3 that can be applied to each cell of an image by rounding down the average of the cell and the eight surrounding cells (i.e., the average of the nine cells in the blue smoother). If one or more of the surrounding cells of a cell is not present, we do not consider it in the average (i.e., the average of the four cells in the red smoother). Given an m x n integer matrix img representing the grayscale of an image, return the image after applying the smoother on each cell of it.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array
[[1,1,1],[1,0,1],[1,1,1]]
[[100,200,100],[200,50,200],[100,200,100]]
Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #661: Image Smoother
class Solution {
public int[][] imageSmoother(int[][] img) {
int m = img.length;
int n = img[0].length;
int[][] ans = new int[m][n];
for (int i = 0; i < m; ++i) {
for (int j = 0; j < n; ++j) {
int s = 0;
int cnt = 0;
for (int x = i - 1; x <= i + 1; ++x) {
for (int y = j - 1; y <= j + 1; ++y) {
if (x >= 0 && x < m && y >= 0 && y < n) {
++cnt;
s += img[x][y];
}
}
}
ans[i][j] = s / cnt;
}
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #661: Image Smoother
func imageSmoother(img [][]int) [][]int {
m, n := len(img), len(img[0])
ans := make([][]int, m)
for i, row := range img {
ans[i] = make([]int, n)
for j := range row {
s, cnt := 0, 0
for x := i - 1; x <= i+1; x++ {
for y := j - 1; y <= j+1; y++ {
if x >= 0 && x < m && y >= 0 && y < n {
cnt++
s += img[x][y]
}
}
}
ans[i][j] = s / cnt
}
}
return ans
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #661: Image Smoother
class Solution:
def imageSmoother(self, img: List[List[int]]) -> List[List[int]]:
m, n = len(img), len(img[0])
ans = [[0] * n for _ in range(m)]
for i in range(m):
for j in range(n):
s = cnt = 0
for x in range(i - 1, i + 2):
for y in range(j - 1, j + 2):
if 0 <= x < m and 0 <= y < n:
cnt += 1
s += img[x][y]
ans[i][j] = s // cnt
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #661: Image Smoother
impl Solution {
pub fn image_smoother(img: Vec<Vec<i32>>) -> Vec<Vec<i32>> {
let m = img.len();
let n = img[0].len();
let mut ans = vec![vec![0; n]; m];
for i in 0..m {
for j in 0..n {
let mut s = 0;
let mut cnt = 0;
for x in i.saturating_sub(1)..=(i + 1).min(m - 1) {
for y in j.saturating_sub(1)..=(j + 1).min(n - 1) {
s += img[x][y];
cnt += 1;
}
}
ans[i][j] = s / cnt;
}
}
ans
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #661: Image Smoother
function imageSmoother(img: number[][]): number[][] {
const m = img.length;
const n = img[0].length;
const ans: number[][] = Array.from({ length: m }, () => Array(n).fill(0));
for (let i = 0; i < m; ++i) {
for (let j = 0; j < n; ++j) {
let s = 0;
let cnt = 0;
for (let x = i - 1; x <= i + 1; ++x) {
for (let y = j - 1; y <= j + 1; ++y) {
if (x >= 0 && x < m && y >= 0 && y < n) {
++cnt;
s += img[x][y];
}
}
}
ans[i][j] = Math.floor(s / cnt);
}
}
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.