Forgetting null/base-case handling
Wrong move: Recursive traversal assumes children always exist.
Usually fails on: Leaf nodes throw errors or create wrong depth/path values.
Fix: Handle null/base cases before recursive transitions.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using tree strategy.
Given the root of a binary tree, return the maximum width of the given tree.
The maximum width of a tree is the maximum width among all levels.
The width of one level is defined as the length between the end-nodes (the leftmost and rightmost non-null nodes), where the null nodes between the end-nodes that would be present in a complete binary tree extending down to that level are also counted into the length calculation.
It is guaranteed that the answer will in the range of a 32-bit signed integer.
Example 1:
Input: root = [1,3,2,5,3,null,9] Output: 4 Explanation: The maximum width exists in the third level with length 4 (5,3,null,9).
Example 2:
Input: root = [1,3,2,5,null,null,9,6,null,7] Output: 7 Explanation: The maximum width exists in the fourth level with length 7 (6,null,null,null,null,null,7).
Example 3:
Input: root = [1,3,2,5] Output: 2 Explanation: The maximum width exists in the second level with length 2 (3,2).
Constraints:
[1, 3000].-100 <= Node.val <= 100Problem summary: Given the root of a binary tree, return the maximum width of the given tree. The maximum width of a tree is the maximum width among all levels. The width of one level is defined as the length between the end-nodes (the leftmost and rightmost non-null nodes), where the null nodes between the end-nodes that would be present in a complete binary tree extending down to that level are also counted into the length calculation. It is guaranteed that the answer will in the range of a 32-bit signed integer.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Tree
[1,3,2,5,3,null,9]
[1,3,2,5,null,null,9,6,null,7]
[1,3,2,5]
Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #662: Maximum Width of Binary Tree
/**
* Definition for a binary tree node.
* public class TreeNode {
* int val;
* TreeNode left;
* TreeNode right;
* TreeNode() {}
* TreeNode(int val) { this.val = val; }
* TreeNode(int val, TreeNode left, TreeNode right) {
* this.val = val;
* this.left = left;
* this.right = right;
* }
* }
*/
class Solution {
public int widthOfBinaryTree(TreeNode root) {
Deque<Pair<TreeNode, Integer>> q = new ArrayDeque<>();
q.offer(new Pair<>(root, 1));
int ans = 0;
while (!q.isEmpty()) {
ans = Math.max(ans, q.peekLast().getValue() - q.peekFirst().getValue() + 1);
for (int n = q.size(); n > 0; --n) {
var p = q.pollFirst();
root = p.getKey();
int i = p.getValue();
if (root.left != null) {
q.offer(new Pair<>(root.left, i << 1));
}
if (root.right != null) {
q.offer(new Pair<>(root.right, i << 1 | 1));
}
}
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #662: Maximum Width of Binary Tree
/**
* Definition for a binary tree node.
* type TreeNode struct {
* Val int
* Left *TreeNode
* Right *TreeNode
* }
*/
func widthOfBinaryTree(root *TreeNode) int {
q := []pair{{root, 1}}
ans := 0
for len(q) > 0 {
ans = max(ans, q[len(q)-1].i-q[0].i+1)
for n := len(q); n > 0; n-- {
p := q[0]
q = q[1:]
root = p.node
if root.Left != nil {
q = append(q, pair{root.Left, p.i << 1})
}
if root.Right != nil {
q = append(q, pair{root.Right, p.i<<1 | 1})
}
}
}
return ans
}
type pair struct {
node *TreeNode
i int
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #662: Maximum Width of Binary Tree
# Definition for a binary tree node.
# class TreeNode:
# def __init__(self, val=0, left=None, right=None):
# self.val = val
# self.left = left
# self.right = right
class Solution:
def widthOfBinaryTree(self, root: Optional[TreeNode]) -> int:
ans = 0
q = deque([(root, 1)])
while q:
ans = max(ans, q[-1][1] - q[0][1] + 1)
for _ in range(len(q)):
root, i = q.popleft()
if root.left:
q.append((root.left, i << 1))
if root.right:
q.append((root.right, i << 1 | 1))
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #662: Maximum Width of Binary Tree
struct Solution;
use rustgym_util::*;
use std::collections::HashMap;
trait Preorder {
fn preorder(
&self,
row: usize,
pos: u32,
min: &mut HashMap<usize, u32>,
max: &mut HashMap<usize, u32>,
diff: &mut u32,
);
}
impl Preorder for TreeLink {
fn preorder(
&self,
row: usize,
pos: u32,
min: &mut HashMap<usize, u32>,
max: &mut HashMap<usize, u32>,
diff: &mut u32,
) {
if let Some(node) = self {
min.entry(row).or_insert(pos);
max.entry(row).or_insert(pos);
*min.get_mut(&row).unwrap() = min[&row].min(pos);
*max.get_mut(&row).unwrap() = max[&row].max(pos);
*diff = (*diff).max(max[&row] - min[&row] + 1);
let node = node.borrow();
node.left.preorder(row + 1, pos << 1, min, max, diff);
node.right.preorder(row + 1, (pos << 1) + 1, min, max, diff);
}
}
}
impl Solution {
fn width_of_binary_tree(root: TreeLink) -> i32 {
let mut min: HashMap<usize, u32> = HashMap::new();
let mut max: HashMap<usize, u32> = HashMap::new();
let mut res = 0;
root.preorder(0, 0, &mut min, &mut max, &mut res);
res as i32
}
}
#[test]
fn test() {
let root = tree!(1, tree!(3, tree!(5), tree!(3)), tree!(2, None, tree!(9)));
let res = 4;
assert_eq!(Solution::width_of_binary_tree(root), res);
let root = tree!(1, tree!(3, tree!(5), tree!(3)), None);
let res = 2;
assert_eq!(Solution::width_of_binary_tree(root), res);
let root = tree!(1, tree!(3, tree!(5), None), tree!(2));
let res = 2;
assert_eq!(Solution::width_of_binary_tree(root), res);
let root = tree!(
1,
tree!(3, tree!(5, tree!(6), None), None),
tree!(2, None, tree!(9, None, tree!(7)))
);
let res = 8;
assert_eq!(Solution::width_of_binary_tree(root), res);
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #662: Maximum Width of Binary Tree
// Auto-generated TypeScript example from java.
function exampleSolution(): void {
}
// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #662: Maximum Width of Binary Tree
// /**
// * Definition for a binary tree node.
// * public class TreeNode {
// * int val;
// * TreeNode left;
// * TreeNode right;
// * TreeNode() {}
// * TreeNode(int val) { this.val = val; }
// * TreeNode(int val, TreeNode left, TreeNode right) {
// * this.val = val;
// * this.left = left;
// * this.right = right;
// * }
// * }
// */
// class Solution {
// public int widthOfBinaryTree(TreeNode root) {
// Deque<Pair<TreeNode, Integer>> q = new ArrayDeque<>();
// q.offer(new Pair<>(root, 1));
// int ans = 0;
// while (!q.isEmpty()) {
// ans = Math.max(ans, q.peekLast().getValue() - q.peekFirst().getValue() + 1);
// for (int n = q.size(); n > 0; --n) {
// var p = q.pollFirst();
// root = p.getKey();
// int i = p.getValue();
// if (root.left != null) {
// q.offer(new Pair<>(root.left, i << 1));
// }
// if (root.right != null) {
// q.offer(new Pair<>(root.right, i << 1 | 1));
// }
// }
// }
// return ans;
// }
// }
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
BFS with a queue visits every node exactly once — O(n) time. The queue may hold an entire level of the tree, which for a complete binary tree is up to n/2 nodes = O(n) space. This is optimal in time but costly in space for wide trees.
Every node is visited exactly once, giving O(n) time. Space depends on tree shape: O(h) for recursive DFS (stack depth = height h), or O(w) for BFS (queue width = widest level). For balanced trees h = log n; for skewed trees h = n.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Recursive traversal assumes children always exist.
Usually fails on: Leaf nodes throw errors or create wrong depth/path values.
Fix: Handle null/base cases before recursive transitions.