Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on array fundamentals.
You are keeping the scores for a baseball game with strange rules. At the beginning of the game, you start with an empty record.
You are given a list of strings operations, where operations[i] is the ith operation you must apply to the record and is one of the following:
x.
x.'+'.
'D'.
'C'.
Return the sum of all the scores on the record after applying all the operations.
The test cases are generated such that the answer and all intermediate calculations fit in a 32-bit integer and that all operations are valid.
Example 1:
Input: ops = ["5","2","C","D","+"] Output: 30 Explanation: "5" - Add 5 to the record, record is now [5]. "2" - Add 2 to the record, record is now [5, 2]. "C" - Invalidate and remove the previous score, record is now [5]. "D" - Add 2 * 5 = 10 to the record, record is now [5, 10]. "+" - Add 5 + 10 = 15 to the record, record is now [5, 10, 15]. The total sum is 5 + 10 + 15 = 30.
Example 2:
Input: ops = ["5","-2","4","C","D","9","+","+"] Output: 27 Explanation: "5" - Add 5 to the record, record is now [5]. "-2" - Add -2 to the record, record is now [5, -2]. "4" - Add 4 to the record, record is now [5, -2, 4]. "C" - Invalidate and remove the previous score, record is now [5, -2]. "D" - Add 2 * -2 = -4 to the record, record is now [5, -2, -4]. "9" - Add 9 to the record, record is now [5, -2, -4, 9]. "+" - Add -4 + 9 = 5 to the record, record is now [5, -2, -4, 9, 5]. "+" - Add 9 + 5 = 14 to the record, record is now [5, -2, -4, 9, 5, 14]. The total sum is 5 + -2 + -4 + 9 + 5 + 14 = 27.
Example 3:
Input: ops = ["1","C"] Output: 0 Explanation: "1" - Add 1 to the record, record is now [1]. "C" - Invalidate and remove the previous score, record is now []. Since the record is empty, the total sum is 0.
Constraints:
1 <= operations.length <= 1000operations[i] is "C", "D", "+", or a string representing an integer in the range [-3 * 104, 3 * 104]."+", there will always be at least two previous scores on the record."C" and "D", there will always be at least one previous score on the record.Problem summary: You are keeping the scores for a baseball game with strange rules. At the beginning of the game, you start with an empty record. You are given a list of strings operations, where operations[i] is the ith operation you must apply to the record and is one of the following: An integer x. Record a new score of x. '+'. Record a new score that is the sum of the previous two scores. 'D'. Record a new score that is the double of the previous score. 'C'. Invalidate the previous score, removing it from the record. Return the sum of all the scores on the record after applying all the operations. The test cases are generated such that the answer and all intermediate calculations fit in a 32-bit integer and that all operations are valid.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Stack
["5","2","C","D","+"]
["5","-2","4","C","D","9","+","+"]
["1","C"]
crawler-log-folder)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #682: Baseball Game
class Solution {
public int calPoints(String[] operations) {
Deque<Integer> stk = new ArrayDeque<>();
for (String op : operations) {
if ("+".equals(op)) {
int a = stk.pop();
int b = stk.peek();
stk.push(a);
stk.push(a + b);
} else if ("D".equals(op)) {
stk.push(stk.peek() << 1);
} else if ("C".equals(op)) {
stk.pop();
} else {
stk.push(Integer.valueOf(op));
}
}
return stk.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).sum();
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #682: Baseball Game
func calPoints(operations []string) (ans int) {
var stk []int
for _, op := range operations {
n := len(stk)
switch op {
case "+":
stk = append(stk, stk[n-1]+stk[n-2])
case "D":
stk = append(stk, stk[n-1]*2)
case "C":
stk = stk[:n-1]
default:
num, _ := strconv.Atoi(op)
stk = append(stk, num)
}
}
for _, x := range stk {
ans += x
}
return
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #682: Baseball Game
class Solution:
def calPoints(self, operations: List[str]) -> int:
stk = []
for op in operations:
if op == "+":
stk.append(stk[-1] + stk[-2])
elif op == "D":
stk.append(stk[-1] << 1)
elif op == "C":
stk.pop()
else:
stk.append(int(op))
return sum(stk)
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #682: Baseball Game
impl Solution {
pub fn cal_points(operations: Vec<String>) -> i32 {
let mut stk = vec![];
for op in operations {
match op.as_str() {
"+" => {
let n = stk.len();
stk.push(stk[n - 1] + stk[n - 2]);
}
"D" => {
stk.push(stk.last().unwrap() * 2);
}
"C" => {
stk.pop();
}
n => {
stk.push(n.parse::<i32>().unwrap());
}
}
}
stk.into_iter().sum()
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #682: Baseball Game
function calPoints(operations: string[]): number {
const stk: number[] = [];
for (const op of operations) {
if (op === '+') {
stk.push(stk.at(-1)! + stk.at(-2)!);
} else if (op === 'D') {
stk.push(stk.at(-1)! << 1);
} else if (op === 'C') {
stk.pop();
} else {
stk.push(+op);
}
}
return stk.reduce((a, b) => a + b, 0);
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
For each element, scan left (or right) to find the next greater/smaller element. The inner scan can visit up to n elements per outer iteration, giving O(n²) total comparisons. No extra space needed beyond loop variables.
Each element is pushed onto the stack at most once and popped at most once, giving 2n total operations = O(n). The stack itself holds at most n elements in the worst case. The key insight: amortized O(1) per element despite the inner while-loop.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Pushing without popping stale elements invalidates next-greater/next-smaller logic.
Usually fails on: Indices point to blocked elements and outputs shift.
Fix: Pop while invariant is violated before pushing current element.