Overflow in intermediate arithmetic
Wrong move: Temporary multiplications exceed integer bounds.
Usually fails on: Large inputs wrap around unexpectedly.
Fix: Use wider types, modular arithmetic, or rearranged operations.
Break down a hard problem into reliable checkpoints, edge-case handling, and complexity trade-offs.
Given an integer n, return the number of ways you can write n as the sum of consecutive positive integers.
Example 1:
Input: n = 5 Output: 2 Explanation: 5 = 2 + 3
Example 2:
Input: n = 9 Output: 3 Explanation: 9 = 4 + 5 = 2 + 3 + 4
Example 3:
Input: n = 15 Output: 4 Explanation: 15 = 8 + 7 = 4 + 5 + 6 = 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5
Constraints:
1 <= n <= 109Problem summary: Given an integer n, return the number of ways you can write n as the sum of consecutive positive integers.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Math
5
9
15
Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #829: Consecutive Numbers Sum
class Solution {
public int consecutiveNumbersSum(int n) {
n <<= 1;
int ans = 0;
for (int k = 1; k * (k + 1) <= n; ++k) {
if (n % k == 0 && (n / k + 1 - k) % 2 == 0) {
++ans;
}
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #829: Consecutive Numbers Sum
func consecutiveNumbersSum(n int) int {
n <<= 1
ans := 0
for k := 1; k*(k+1) <= n; k++ {
if n%k == 0 && (n/k+1-k)%2 == 0 {
ans++
}
}
return ans
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #829: Consecutive Numbers Sum
class Solution:
def consecutiveNumbersSum(self, n: int) -> int:
n <<= 1
ans, k = 0, 1
while k * (k + 1) <= n:
if n % k == 0 and (n // k - k + 1) % 2 == 0:
ans += 1
k += 1
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #829: Consecutive Numbers Sum
struct Solution;
impl Solution {
fn consecutive_numbers_sum(n: i32) -> i32 {
let mut i = 2;
let mut res = 1;
while i * i < 2 * n {
if (n - i * (i - 1) / 2) % i == 0 {
res += 1;
}
i += 1;
}
res
}
}
#[test]
fn test() {
let n = 5;
let res = 2;
assert_eq!(Solution::consecutive_numbers_sum(n), res);
let n = 9;
let res = 3;
assert_eq!(Solution::consecutive_numbers_sum(n), res);
let n = 15;
let res = 4;
assert_eq!(Solution::consecutive_numbers_sum(n), res);
let n = 4;
let res = 1;
assert_eq!(Solution::consecutive_numbers_sum(n), res);
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #829: Consecutive Numbers Sum
function consecutiveNumbersSum(n: number): number {
let ans = 0;
n <<= 1;
for (let k = 1; k * (k + 1) <= n; ++k) {
if (n % k === 0 && (Math.floor(n / k) + 1 - k) % 2 === 0) {
++ans;
}
}
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Simulate the process step by step — multiply n times, check each number up to n, or iterate through all possibilities. Each step is O(1), but doing it n times gives O(n). No extra space needed since we just track running state.
Math problems often have a closed-form or O(log n) solution hidden behind an O(n) simulation. Modular arithmetic, fast exponentiation (repeated squaring), GCD (Euclidean algorithm), and number theory properties can dramatically reduce complexity.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Temporary multiplications exceed integer bounds.
Usually fails on: Large inputs wrap around unexpectedly.
Fix: Use wider types, modular arithmetic, or rearranged operations.