Mutating counts without cleanup
Wrong move: Zero-count keys stay in map and break distinct/count constraints.
Usually fails on: Window/map size checks are consistently off by one.
Fix: Delete keys when count reaches zero.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using hash map strategy.
Given the root of a binary tree, the depth of each node is the shortest distance to the root.
Return the smallest subtree such that it contains all the deepest nodes in the original tree.
A node is called the deepest if it has the largest depth possible among any node in the entire tree.
The subtree of a node is a tree consisting of that node, plus the set of all descendants of that node.
Example 1:
Input: root = [3,5,1,6,2,0,8,null,null,7,4] Output: [2,7,4] Explanation: We return the node with value 2, colored in yellow in the diagram. The nodes coloured in blue are the deepest nodes of the tree. Notice that nodes 5, 3 and 2 contain the deepest nodes in the tree but node 2 is the smallest subtree among them, so we return it.
Example 2:
Input: root = [1] Output: [1] Explanation: The root is the deepest node in the tree.
Example 3:
Input: root = [0,1,3,null,2] Output: [2] Explanation: The deepest node in the tree is 2, the valid subtrees are the subtrees of nodes 2, 1 and 0 but the subtree of node 2 is the smallest.
Constraints:
[1, 500].0 <= Node.val <= 500Note: This question is the same as 1123: https://leetcode.com/problems/lowest-common-ancestor-of-deepest-leaves/
Problem summary: Given the root of a binary tree, the depth of each node is the shortest distance to the root. Return the smallest subtree such that it contains all the deepest nodes in the original tree. A node is called the deepest if it has the largest depth possible among any node in the entire tree. The subtree of a node is a tree consisting of that node, plus the set of all descendants of that node.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Hash Map · Tree
[3,5,1,6,2,0,8,null,null,7,4]
[1]
[0,1,3,null,2]
Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #865: Smallest Subtree with all the Deepest Nodes
/**
* Definition for a binary tree node.
* public class TreeNode {
* int val;
* TreeNode left;
* TreeNode right;
* TreeNode() {}
* TreeNode(int val) { this.val = val; }
* TreeNode(int val, TreeNode left, TreeNode right) {
* this.val = val;
* this.left = left;
* this.right = right;
* }
* }
*/
class Solution {
public TreeNode subtreeWithAllDeepest(TreeNode root) {
return dfs(root).getKey();
}
private Pair<TreeNode, Integer> dfs(TreeNode root) {
if (root == null) {
return new Pair<>(null, 0);
}
var l = dfs(root.left);
var r = dfs(root.right);
int ld = l.getValue(), rd = r.getValue();
if (ld > rd) {
return new Pair<>(l.getKey(), ld + 1);
}
if (ld < rd) {
return new Pair<>(r.getKey(), rd + 1);
}
return new Pair<>(root, ld + 1);
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #865: Smallest Subtree with all the Deepest Nodes
/**
* Definition for a binary tree node.
* type TreeNode struct {
* Val int
* Left *TreeNode
* Right *TreeNode
* }
*/
func subtreeWithAllDeepest(root *TreeNode) *TreeNode {
type pair struct {
node *TreeNode
depth int
}
var dfs func(*TreeNode) pair
dfs = func(root *TreeNode) pair {
if root == nil {
return pair{nil, 0}
}
l, r := dfs(root.Left), dfs(root.Right)
ld, rd := l.depth, r.depth
if ld > rd {
return pair{l.node, ld + 1}
}
if ld < rd {
return pair{r.node, rd + 1}
}
return pair{root, ld + 1}
}
return dfs(root).node
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #865: Smallest Subtree with all the Deepest Nodes
# Definition for a binary tree node.
# class TreeNode:
# def __init__(self, val=0, left=None, right=None):
# self.val = val
# self.left = left
# self.right = right
class Solution:
def subtreeWithAllDeepest(self, root: Optional[TreeNode]) -> Optional[TreeNode]:
def dfs(root: Optional[TreeNode]) -> Tuple[Optional[TreeNode], int]:
if root is None:
return None, 0
l, ld = dfs(root.left)
r, rd = dfs(root.right)
if ld > rd:
return l, ld + 1
if ld < rd:
return r, rd + 1
return root, ld + 1
return dfs(root)[0]
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #865: Smallest Subtree with all the Deepest Nodes
// Definition for a binary tree node.
// #[derive(Debug, PartialEq, Eq)]
// pub struct TreeNode {
// pub val: i32,
// pub left: Option<Rc<RefCell<TreeNode>>>,
// pub right: Option<Rc<RefCell<TreeNode>>>,
// }
//
// impl TreeNode {
// #[inline]
// pub fn new(val: i32) -> Self {
// TreeNode {
// val,
// left: None,
// right: None
// }
// }
// }
use std::cell::RefCell;
use std::rc::Rc;
impl Solution {
pub fn subtree_with_all_deepest(
root: Option<Rc<RefCell<TreeNode>>>,
) -> Option<Rc<RefCell<TreeNode>>> {
fn dfs(
root: Option<Rc<RefCell<TreeNode>>>,
) -> (Option<Rc<RefCell<TreeNode>>>, i32) {
if let Some(node) = root {
let left = node.borrow().left.clone();
let right = node.borrow().right.clone();
let (l, ld) = dfs(left);
let (r, rd) = dfs(right);
if ld > rd {
(l, ld + 1)
} else if ld < rd {
(r, rd + 1)
} else {
(Some(node), ld + 1)
}
} else {
(None, 0)
}
}
dfs(root).0
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #865: Smallest Subtree with all the Deepest Nodes
/**
* Definition for a binary tree node.
* class TreeNode {
* val: number
* left: TreeNode | null
* right: TreeNode | null
* constructor(val?: number, left?: TreeNode | null, right?: TreeNode | null) {
* this.val = (val===undefined ? 0 : val)
* this.left = (left===undefined ? null : left)
* this.right = (right===undefined ? null : right)
* }
* }
*/
function subtreeWithAllDeepest(root: TreeNode | null): TreeNode | null {
const dfs = (root: TreeNode | null): [TreeNode, number] => {
if (!root) {
return [null, 0];
}
const [l, ld] = dfs(root.left);
const [r, rd] = dfs(root.right);
if (ld > rd) {
return [l, ld + 1];
}
if (ld < rd) {
return [r, rd + 1];
}
return [root, ld + 1];
};
return dfs(root)[0];
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
BFS with a queue visits every node exactly once — O(n) time. The queue may hold an entire level of the tree, which for a complete binary tree is up to n/2 nodes = O(n) space. This is optimal in time but costly in space for wide trees.
Every node is visited exactly once, giving O(n) time. Space depends on tree shape: O(h) for recursive DFS (stack depth = height h), or O(w) for BFS (queue width = widest level). For balanced trees h = log n; for skewed trees h = n.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Zero-count keys stay in map and break distinct/count constraints.
Usually fails on: Window/map size checks are consistently off by one.
Fix: Delete keys when count reaches zero.
Wrong move: Recursive traversal assumes children always exist.
Usually fails on: Leaf nodes throw errors or create wrong depth/path values.
Fix: Handle null/base cases before recursive transitions.