LeetCode #88 — EASY

Merge Sorted Array

Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on array fundamentals.

The Problem

Problem Statement

You are given two integer arrays nums1 and nums2, sorted in non-decreasing order, and two integers m and n, representing the number of elements in nums1 and nums2 respectively.

Merge nums1 and nums2 into a single array sorted in non-decreasing order.

The final sorted array should not be returned by the function, but instead be stored inside the array nums1. To accommodate this, nums1 has a length of m + n, where the first m elements denote the elements that should be merged, and the last n elements are set to 0 and should be ignored. nums2 has a length of n.

Example 1:

Input: nums1 = [1,2,3,0,0,0], m = 3, nums2 = [2,5,6], n = 3
Output: [1,2,2,3,5,6]
Explanation: The arrays we are merging are [1,2,3] and [2,5,6].
The result of the merge is [1,2,2,3,5,6] with the underlined elements coming from nums1.

Example 2:

Input: nums1 = [1], m = 1, nums2 = [], n = 0
Output: [1]
Explanation: The arrays we are merging are [1] and [].
The result of the merge is [1].

Example 3:

Input: nums1 = [0], m = 0, nums2 = [1], n = 1
Output: [1]
Explanation: The arrays we are merging are [] and [1].
The result of the merge is [1].
Note that because m = 0, there are no elements in nums1. The 0 is only there to ensure the merge result can fit in nums1.

Constraints:

nums1.length == m + n
nums2.length == n
0 <= m, n <= 200
1 <= m + n <= 200
-10⁹ <= nums1[i], nums2[j] <= 10⁹

Follow up: Can you come up with an algorithm that runs in O(m + n) time?

Step 01

Brute Force Baseline

Problem summary: You are given two integer arrays nums1 and nums2, sorted in non-decreasing order, and two integers m and n, representing the number of elements in nums1 and nums2 respectively. Merge nums1 and nums2 into a single array sorted in non-decreasing order. The final sorted array should not be returned by the function, but instead be stored inside the array nums1. To accommodate this, nums1 has a length of m + n, where the first m elements denote the elements that should be merged, and the last n elements are set to 0 and should be ignored. nums2 has a length of n.

Baseline thinking

Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.

Pattern signal: Array · Two Pointers

Example 1

[1,2,3,0,0,0]
3
[2,5,6]
3

Example 2

[1]
1
[]
0

Example 3

[0]
0
[1]
1

Core Insight

What unlocks the optimal approach

You can easily solve this problem if you simply think about two elements at a time rather than two arrays. We know that each of the individual arrays is sorted. What we don't know is how they will intertwine. Can we take a local decision and arrive at an optimal solution?
If you simply consider one element each at a time from the two arrays and make a decision and proceed accordingly, you will arrive at the optimal solution.

Interview move: turn each hint into an invariant you can check after every iteration/recursion step.

Step 03

Algorithm Walkthrough

Iteration Checklist

Define state (indices, window, stack, map, DP cell, or recursion frame).
Apply one transition step and update the invariant.
Record answer candidate when condition is met.
Continue until all input is consumed.

Use the first example testcase as your mental trace to verify each transition.

Step 04

Edge Cases

Minimum Input

Single element / shortest valid input

Validate boundary behavior before entering the main loop or recursion.

Duplicates & Repeats

Repeated values / repeated states

Decide whether duplicates should be merged, skipped, or counted explicitly.

Extreme Constraints

Upper-end input sizes

Re-check complexity target against constraints to avoid time-limit issues.

Invalid / Corner Shape

Empty collections, zeros, or disconnected structures

Handle special-case structure before the core algorithm path.

Step 05

Full Annotated Code

class Solution {
    public void merge(int[] nums1, int m, int[] nums2, int n) {
        int i = m - 1, j = n - 1, k = m + n - 1;
        while (j >= 0) {
            if (i >= 0 && nums1[i] > nums2[j]) nums1[k--] = nums1[i--];
            else nums1[k--] = nums2[j--];
        }
    }
}

func merge(nums1 []int, m int, nums2 []int, n int) {
    i, j, k := m-1, n-1, m+n-1
    for j >= 0 {
        if i >= 0 && nums1[i] > nums2[j] {
            nums1[k] = nums1[i]
            i--
        } else {
            nums1[k] = nums2[j]
            j--
        }
        k--
    }
}

class Solution:
    def merge(self, nums1: List[int], m: int, nums2: List[int], n: int) -> None:
        i, j, k = m - 1, n - 1, m + n - 1
        while j >= 0:
            if i >= 0 and nums1[i] > nums2[j]:
                nums1[k] = nums1[i]
                i -= 1
            else:
                nums1[k] = nums2[j]
                j -= 1
            k -= 1

impl Solution {
    pub fn merge(nums1: &mut Vec<i32>, m: i32, nums2: &mut Vec<i32>, n: i32) {
        let mut i = m - 1;
        let mut j = n - 1;
        let mut k = m + n - 1;

        while j >= 0 {
            if i >= 0 && nums1[i as usize] > nums2[j as usize] {
                nums1[k as usize] = nums1[i as usize];
                i -= 1;
            } else {
                nums1[k as usize] = nums2[j as usize];
                j -= 1;
            }
            k -= 1;
        }
    }
}

function merge(nums1: number[], m: number, nums2: number[], n: number): void {
  let i = m - 1;
  let j = n - 1;
  let k = m + n - 1;

  while (j >= 0) {
    if (i >= 0 && nums1[i] > nums2[j]) nums1[k--] = nums1[i--];
    else nums1[k--] = nums2[j--];
  }
}

Step 06

Interactive Study Demo

Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.

Custom checkpoints (one per line)

Press Step or Run All to begin.

Step 07

Complexity Analysis

Time

O(n)

Space

O(1)

Approach Breakdown

BRUTE FORCE

O(n²) time

O(1) space

Two nested loops check every pair of elements. The outer loop picks one element, the inner loop scans the rest. For n elements that is n × (n−1)/2 comparisons = O(n²). No extra memory — just two loop variables.

TWO POINTERS

O(n) time

O(1) space

Each pointer traverses the array at most once. With two pointers moving inward (or both moving right), the total number of steps is bounded by n. Each comparison is O(1), giving O(n) overall. No auxiliary data structures are needed — just two index variables.

Shortcut: Two converging pointers on sorted data → O(n) time, O(1) space.

Coach Notes

Common Mistakes

Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.

Off-by-one on range boundaries

Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.

Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.

Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.

Moving both pointers on every comparison

Wrong move: Advancing both pointers shrinks the search space too aggressively and skips candidates.

Usually fails on: A valid pair can be skipped when only one side should move.

Fix: Move exactly one pointer per decision branch based on invariant.