Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on design fundamentals.
You have a RecentCounter class which counts the number of recent requests within a certain time frame.
Implement the RecentCounter class:
RecentCounter() Initializes the counter with zero recent requests.int ping(int t) Adds a new request at time t, where t represents some time in milliseconds, and returns the number of requests that has happened in the past 3000 milliseconds (including the new request). Specifically, return the number of requests that have happened in the inclusive range [t - 3000, t].It is guaranteed that every call to ping uses a strictly larger value of t than the previous call.
Example 1:
Input ["RecentCounter", "ping", "ping", "ping", "ping"] [[], [1], [100], [3001], [3002]] Output [null, 1, 2, 3, 3] Explanation RecentCounter recentCounter = new RecentCounter(); recentCounter.ping(1); // requests = [1], range is [-2999,1], return 1 recentCounter.ping(100); // requests = [1, 100], range is [-2900,100], return 2 recentCounter.ping(3001); // requests = [1, 100, 3001], range is [1,3001], return 3 recentCounter.ping(3002); // requests = [1, 100, 3001, 3002], range is [2,3002], return 3
Constraints:
1 <= t <= 109ping with strictly increasing values of t.104 calls will be made to ping.Problem summary: You have a RecentCounter class which counts the number of recent requests within a certain time frame. Implement the RecentCounter class: RecentCounter() Initializes the counter with zero recent requests. int ping(int t) Adds a new request at time t, where t represents some time in milliseconds, and returns the number of requests that has happened in the past 3000 milliseconds (including the new request). Specifically, return the number of requests that have happened in the inclusive range [t - 3000, t]. It is guaranteed that every call to ping uses a strictly larger value of t than the previous call.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Design
["RecentCounter","ping","ping","ping","ping"] [[],[1],[100],[3001],[3002]]
Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #933: Number of Recent Calls
class RecentCounter {
private int[] s = new int[10010];
private int idx;
public RecentCounter() {
}
public int ping(int t) {
s[idx++] = t;
return idx - search(t - 3000);
}
private int search(int x) {
int left = 0, right = idx;
while (left < right) {
int mid = (left + right) >> 1;
if (s[mid] >= x) {
right = mid;
} else {
left = mid + 1;
}
}
return left;
}
}
/**
* Your RecentCounter object will be instantiated and called as such:
* RecentCounter obj = new RecentCounter();
* int param_1 = obj.ping(t);
*/
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #933: Number of Recent Calls
type RecentCounter struct {
q []int
}
func Constructor() RecentCounter {
return RecentCounter{[]int{}}
}
func (this *RecentCounter) Ping(t int) int {
this.q = append(this.q, t)
for this.q[0] < t-3000 {
this.q = this.q[1:]
}
return len(this.q)
}
/**
* Your RecentCounter object will be instantiated and called as such:
* obj := Constructor();
* param_1 := obj.Ping(t);
*/
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #933: Number of Recent Calls
class RecentCounter:
def __init__(self):
self.q = deque()
def ping(self, t: int) -> int:
self.q.append(t)
while self.q[0] < t - 3000:
self.q.popleft()
return len(self.q)
# Your RecentCounter object will be instantiated and called as such:
# obj = RecentCounter()
# param_1 = obj.ping(t)
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #933: Number of Recent Calls
use std::collections::VecDeque;
struct RecentCounter {
queue: VecDeque<i32>,
}
/**
* `&self` means the method takes an immutable reference.
* If you need a mutable reference, change it to `&mut self` instead.
*/
impl RecentCounter {
fn new() -> Self {
Self {
queue: VecDeque::new(),
}
}
fn ping(&mut self, t: i32) -> i32 {
self.queue.push_back(t);
while let Some(&v) = self.queue.front() {
if v >= t - 3000 {
break;
}
self.queue.pop_front();
}
self.queue.len() as i32
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #933: Number of Recent Calls
class RecentCounter {
private queue: number[];
constructor() {
this.queue = [];
}
ping(t: number): number {
this.queue.push(t);
while (this.queue[0] < t - 3000) {
this.queue.shift();
}
return this.queue.length;
}
}
/**
* Your RecentCounter object will be instantiated and called as such:
* var obj = new RecentCounter()
* var param_1 = obj.ping(t)
*/
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Use a simple list or array for storage. Each operation (get, put, remove) requires a linear scan to find the target element — O(n) per operation. Space is O(n) to store the data. The linear search makes this impractical for frequent operations.
Design problems target O(1) amortized per operation by combining data structures (hash map + doubly-linked list for LRU, stack + min-tracking for MinStack). Space is always at least O(n) to store the data. The challenge is achieving constant-time operations through clever structure composition.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.